<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Nasty Divorce: Rich Rodriguez, West Virginia, and Big-Time Football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-west-virginia-and-big-time-foo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-west-virginia-and-big-time-foo/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drdoc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-west-virginia-and-big-time-foo/comment-page-1/#comment-71486</link>
		<dc:creator>drdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-#comment-71486</guid>
		<description>Tricky LC question: what if he put up an LC that required the beneficiary to present a document stating that Rich Rodriguez had done nothing wrong. 

What about the requirement to present an &quot;original&quot; and as the 5th cout of appeal just found out, a fax copy at least when using the UCP 400 does not qualify as an original. Taking into account that banks rarely mail originals that LC might be useless. Or excluding the article from the UCP 600 that permits presentation of originals... 

If someone wants to play, LCs are the playing field you want to be on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricky LC question: what if he put up an LC that required the beneficiary to present a document stating that Rich Rodriguez had done nothing wrong. </p>
<p>What about the requirement to present an &#8220;original&#8221; and as the 5th cout of appeal just found out, a fax copy at least when using the UCP 400 does not qualify as an original. Taking into account that banks rarely mail originals that LC might be useless. Or excluding the article from the UCP 600 that permits presentation of originals&#8230; </p>
<p>If someone wants to play, LCs are the playing field you want to be on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-west-virginia-and-big-time-foo/comment-page-1/#comment-58358</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-#comment-58358</guid>
		<description>Too bad that sports more about law and contracts than abbout winning and a good game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad that sports more about law and contracts than abbout winning and a good game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houston Divorce Attorney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-west-virginia-and-big-time-foo/comment-page-1/#comment-55613</link>
		<dc:creator>Houston Divorce Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/02/01/another-nasty-divorce-rich-rodriguez-#comment-55613</guid>
		<description>In my book he breached the contract for sure.  These coaches and schools are so lenient in their upholding of contracts as long as money changes hands as you pointed out.  If the coach does not want to be there, they have leverage on the school from a &quot;bad PR&quot; stand point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my book he breached the contract for sure.  These coaches and schools are so lenient in their upholding of contracts as long as money changes hands as you pointed out.  If the coach does not want to be there, they have leverage on the school from a &#8220;bad PR&#8221; stand point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
