<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wal-Queda Defeats Wal-Mart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/03/31/wal-queda-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/03/31/wal-queda-decision/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:24:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark McKenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/03/31/wal-queda-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-50124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/03/31/wal-queda-decision/#comment-50124</guid>
		<description>Yes, Bill, this sounds like exhibit A for your paper.  I&#039;ll have to read the opinion, but this seems to me precisely why we need defenses that are not bound up in likelihood of confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Bill, this sounds like exhibit A for your paper.  I&#8217;ll have to read the opinion, but this seems to me precisely why we need defenses that are not bound up in likelihood of confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
