<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Thorough Trademark Policing Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:34:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fishing Reels For Sale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-66758</link>
		<dc:creator>Fishing Reels For Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/#comment-66758</guid>
		<description>i understand that many people are concerned about protecting their trade mark so they do not loose it. But, phrases like &quot;Got Milk&quot; should not be trade marked in unto itself but only to a specific situation; no more, no less. Common speech or even near common speech should not be controllable by corporate America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i understand that many people are concerned about protecting their trade mark so they do not loose it. But, phrases like &#8220;Got Milk&#8221; should not be trade marked in unto itself but only to a specific situation; no more, no less. Common speech or even near common speech should not be controllable by corporate America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-66757</link>
		<dc:creator>Big John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/#comment-66757</guid>
		<description>They all think that their trademarks are defendable to the inth degree. The strategy behind mos C&amp;D letters relies on the people receiving them never having received one and freaking out. Most letters ask for way too much. I think trade marking phraseology should be closely monitored and restricted. Good for the lady standing up to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all think that their trademarks are defendable to the inth degree. The strategy behind mos C&amp;D letters relies on the people receiving them never having received one and freaking out. Most letters ask for way too much. I think trade marking phraseology should be closely monitored and restricted. Good for the lady standing up to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got Cease and Desist? &#171; Known In the Marts of Commerce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-58491</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Cease and Desist? &#171; Known In the Marts of Commerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/#comment-58491</guid>
		<description>[...] Cease and&#160;Desist? 30Jul08    William McGeveran of Info/Law has some interesting thoughts on a cease and desist letter from lawyers for the California Milk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cease and&nbsp;Desist? 30Jul08    William McGeveran of Info/Law has some interesting thoughts on a cease and desist letter from lawyers for the California Milk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthy Food, Healthy Image, Healthy Fearmongering. &#171; Cheap Paper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-58381</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthy Food, Healthy Image, Healthy Fearmongering. &#171; Cheap Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/07/29/the-most-thorough-trademark-policing-ever/#comment-58381</guid>
		<description>[...] A nice summary of the situation here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A nice summary of the situation here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
