<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2nd Circuit: A Copy that Exists for 1 Second is No &#8220;Copy&#8221; at All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Supreme Court Leaves Info/Law Alone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-91326</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Supreme Court Leaves Info/Law Alone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/#comment-91326</guid>
		<description>[...] co-blogger Tim&#8217;s heart, as he has described before. The Supreme Court refused to review the Second Circuit&#8217;s opinion finding that Cablevision&#8217;s proposed new DVR system does not violate copyright law. (Public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] co-blogger Tim&#8217;s heart, as he has described before. The Supreme Court refused to review the Second Circuit&#8217;s opinion finding that Cablevision&#8217;s proposed new DVR system does not violate copyright law. (Public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Grading the New Administration&#8217;s Innovation Policy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-87617</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Grading the New Administration&#8217;s Innovation Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/#comment-87617</guid>
		<description>[...] concerning the pending cert petition in CNN, Inc. v. CSC Holdings, no. 08-448 (better known as the Cablevision case).  The Court&#8217;s rules don&#8217;t oblige the SG to file by any particular date, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concerning the pending cert petition in CNN, Inc. v. CSC Holdings, no. 08-448 (better known as the Cablevision case).  The Court&#8217;s rules don&#8217;t oblige the SG to file by any particular date, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-60976</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/08/05/2nd-circuit-a-copy-that-exists-for-1-second-is-no-copy-at-all/#comment-60976</guid>
		<description>Gosh darn it, they should have just said MAI is bad law!  *sigh*

Its progress, slow and steady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh darn it, they should have just said MAI is bad law!  *sigh*</p>
<p>Its progress, slow and steady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
