<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Margolick on AutoAdmit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2009/02/13/margolick-on-autoadmit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2009/02/13/margolick-on-autoadmit/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Celebrity Impersonation and Section 230</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2009/02/13/margolick-on-autoadmit/comment-page-1/#comment-90977</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Celebrity Impersonation and Section 230</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/?p=460#comment-90977</guid>
		<description>[...] could plead around section 230 by claiming trademark or publicity rights in their name, while many ordinary people victimized by defamation or cyber-bullying would have their claims blocked. Other law, defamation in particular, expects celebrities to have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could plead around section 230 by claiming trademark or publicity rights in their name, while many ordinary people victimized by defamation or cyber-bullying would have their claims blocked. Other law, defamation in particular, expects celebrities to have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The AutoAdmit Case and the Future of Sec. 230 &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2009/02/13/margolick-on-autoadmit/comment-page-1/#comment-76551</link>
		<dc:creator>The AutoAdmit Case and the Future of Sec. 230 &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/?p=460#comment-76551</guid>
		<description>[...] case could end up bringing 230 back up for political reconsideration.  Commenting on this on the Info/Law blog, William McGeveran of the University of Minnesota Law School summarizes my own feelings regarding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case could end up bringing 230 back up for political reconsideration.  Commenting on this on the Info/Law blog, William McGeveran of the University of Minnesota Law School summarizes my own feelings regarding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
