• Home
  • Subscribe to Jim's RSS feed, click here
  • Jim Moore

Jim Moore’s blog: Innovation, Strategy, Public Policy

I celebrate small companies, new voices, inventive teams and individuals

Feed on
Posts
Comments

BloggerCon

Feb 20th, 2004 by jimmoore

Another BloggerCon is coming in April!  See us in Cambridge in the Spring…

Also this
from Dave Winer.  Dave has this idea that we should develop voter
support systems.  His post highlights the need for the voter
support systems to include a candidate and elected official
accountability module.

Addendum:  Dave’s post also highlights the need for the voter
suppor system to have a realtime dirty tricks detector and response
feature and a campaign competitive analysis and media manipulation
module.

I went to a seminar at the Kennedy School
yesterday doing a postmortem on the Dean campaign. The discussion was
led by a Chicago Sun-Times columnist and a political operative who ran
a PAC that ran negative ads successfully against Dean in Iowa. He
repeated that the only thing that mattered was winning. It didn’t occur
to me until this morning why that is wrong. Maybe it’s true from the
candidate’s perspective, but it’s not true from the voter’s. What
matters to the voter is getting representated. In the current political
system that can’t happen. Think about it this way. What if, in 2000,
your main issue had been No Nation Building. Easy. Vote for Bush. What
does he do his first week in office? Gets ready to do some
nation-building. Did he know he would invade Iraq when he was running?
You be the judge. In any case, as with most centralized businesses, the
voters are a herd, not meant to be heard. At one point I leaned over to
one of my colleagues and said “These guys are the enemy.” 
height=”9″ border=”0″ alt=”Permanent link to this item in the archive.”>

Posted in Economics and cybenetics | No Comments

Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • July 2008 (4)
    • June 2008 (5)
    • March 2008 (1)
    • October 2007 (1)
    • August 2007 (2)
    • July 2007 (1)
    • June 2007 (3)
    • May 2007 (4)
    • April 2007 (3)
    • March 2007 (1)
    • February 2007 (12)
    • January 2007 (3)
    • December 2006 (10)
    • November 2006 (3)
    • October 2006 (42)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (12)
    • July 2006 (12)
    • June 2006 (13)
    • May 2006 (6)
    • April 2006 (4)
    • March 2006 (4)
    • February 2006 (11)
    • January 2006 (20)
    • December 2005 (46)
    • November 2005 (27)
    • October 2005 (7)
    • September 2005 (21)
    • August 2005 (16)
    • July 2005 (18)
    • June 2005 (1)
    • May 2005 (1)
    • April 2005 (1)
    • March 2005 (5)
    • February 2005 (5)
    • January 2005 (10)
    • December 2004 (26)
    • November 2004 (18)
    • October 2004 (54)
    • September 2004 (18)
    • August 2004 (26)
    • July 2004 (36)
    • June 2004 (51)
    • May 2004 (47)
    • April 2004 (25)
    • March 2004 (18)
    • February 2004 (59)
    • January 2004 (49)
    • December 2003 (33)
    • November 2003 (33)
    • October 2003 (38)
    • September 2003 (19)
    • August 2003 (5)
    • July 2003 (12)
    • June 2003 (17)
    • May 2003 (2)
    • April 2003 (37)
    • March 2003 (1)
  • Categories

    • American economic leadership (3)
    • Innovation (3)
    • Intellectual propery (2)
    • Jim Moore's personal blog archives (933)
      • All and everything (29)
      • Economics and cybenetics (726)
      • jimStories (66)
      • Personal life, love and laughs (30)
      • Presidential politics (81)
    • OPML Applications (7)
    • OPML Economics (8)
    • OPML Innovators (6)
    • OPML Politics (7)
    • OPML Technology (4)
    • OPML Theory (5)
    • OPML Vision (17)
    • OPML-The Harvard Book of (17)
    • Patent (1)
    • Patent reform (2)
    • Patents (2)
    • World Economy (1)
  • Pages

    • Subscribe to Jim's RSS feed, click here
    • Jim Moore

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish


Protected by Akismet • Blog with WordPress