• Home
  • Subscribe to Jim’s RSS feed, click here
  • Jim Moore

Jim Moore’s blog: Innovation, Strategy, Public Policy

I celebrate small companies, new voices, inventive teams and individuals

Feed on
Posts
Comments

Google in China–best article I’ve seen, by John Gapper in the Australian

Jan 30th, 2006 by jimmoore

Larry Lessig, take a look at this one. It
demonstrates how Google and Microsoft and all the others slide down the
slippery slope toward the repressive future your describe in
Code.  This is the best article I have seen anywhere on Google in
China..Read the whole article here, from the Australian. Thank you John Gapper!

>Net giants beware: freedom may not last

John Gapper

January 31, 2006

SILICON Valley came to the mountains of Switzerland at Davos last week.
Was it my imagination or did its leaders look shamefaced?



Normally, figures such as Bill Gates of Microsoft and Sergey Brin and
Larry Page of Google are as proud as other software engineers. They are
richer and smarter than most of us and they believe that they are
improving our way of life.

Making money by making the world a better place is nice work if you
can get it. Google’s founders are so convinced they combine the two
that they made “Don’t be evil” a founding principle. But what happens
when business interests clash with ethics? That is occurring in China -
not only to Google, but to Microsoft and Yahoo - and it ought to make
them worried.

Gates teased Eric Schmidt, chief executive of Google, at the
World Economic Forum in Davos after Schmidt ran through the company’s
strained defence of why it was censoring its search service in China.
It was better to run a local search engine that blocked access to sites
than to deny local citizens a speedy Google, he said. It was the lesser
of two evils.

Gates had fun with that, pointing out that “Don’t be evil” is
not a relative commandment. But Microsoft’s chairman has little to be
proud of. His company shut down the blog of a Chinese activist that the
country’s government did not like. Quizzed about that at another Davos
event, Gates indulged in a bit of relativism himself: it was the price
that had to be paid for bringing a liberating technology to China.

more

Posted in Presidential politics | No Comments

Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • September 2008 (5)
    • July 2008 (4)
    • June 2008 (5)
    • March 2008 (1)
    • October 2007 (1)
    • August 2007 (2)
    • July 2007 (1)
    • June 2007 (3)
    • May 2007 (4)
    • April 2007 (3)
    • March 2007 (1)
    • February 2007 (12)
    • January 2007 (3)
    • December 2006 (10)
    • November 2006 (3)
    • October 2006 (42)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (12)
    • July 2006 (12)
    • June 2006 (13)
    • May 2006 (6)
    • April 2006 (4)
    • March 2006 (4)
    • February 2006 (11)
    • January 2006 (20)
    • December 2005 (46)
    • November 2005 (27)
    • October 2005 (7)
    • September 2005 (21)
    • August 2005 (16)
    • July 2005 (18)
    • June 2005 (1)
    • May 2005 (1)
    • April 2005 (1)
    • March 2005 (5)
    • February 2005 (5)
    • January 2005 (10)
    • December 2004 (26)
    • November 2004 (18)
    • October 2004 (54)
    • September 2004 (18)
    • August 2004 (26)
    • July 2004 (36)
    • June 2004 (51)
    • May 2004 (47)
    • April 2004 (25)
    • March 2004 (18)
    • February 2004 (59)
    • January 2004 (49)
    • December 2003 (33)
    • November 2003 (33)
    • October 2003 (38)
    • September 2003 (19)
    • August 2003 (5)
    • July 2003 (12)
    • June 2003 (17)
    • May 2003 (2)
    • April 2003 (37)
    • March 2003 (1)
  • Categories

    • 1 (5)
    • American economic leadership (3)
    • Innovation (3)
    • Intellectual propery (2)
    • Jim Moore's personal blog archives (933)
      • All and everything (29)
      • Economics and cybenetics (726)
      • jimStories (66)
      • Personal life, love and laughs (30)
      • Presidential politics (81)
    • OPML Applications (7)
    • OPML Economics (8)
    • OPML Innovators (6)
    • OPML Politics (7)
    • OPML Technology (4)
    • OPML Theory (5)
    • OPML Vision (17)
    • OPML-The Harvard Book of (17)
    • Patent (1)
    • Patent reform (2)
    • Patents (2)
    • World Economy (1)
  • Pages

    • Subscribe to Jim’s RSS feed, click here
    • Jim Moore

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish


Protected by Akismet • Blog with WordPress