You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Speaking for Secular Jews?

There’s something that makes me uncomfortable about many discussions of anti-Semitism. I can’t put my finger on it exactly, but it has to do with (i) the extent to which I think about being Jewish as racial versus religious, and (ii) how I feel about proponents’ tight linkage between the State of Israel and Judaism.

More or less, I think of Judaism as a religious thing, as a set of beliefs, rituals, and cultural factors that can in principle be separated from bloodlines. I’m aware that at this point in my life, many of these “cultural factors” are so deeply ingrained in me that they might as well be racial characteristics. But I nonetheless resist the absoluteness of the racial definition, in no small part because it aligns me with people like the ultra-Orthodox who are more different from me than (say) many secular Christians and Muslims.

Second, I think of Israel as a state– a political entity– rather than a dream.  As a result, to my mind a priori exclamations that “Israel has a right to exist!” don’t suffice. To what extent does any state have a “right to exist”? Who decides? On what principles?

It was recently decided that Iraq didn’t have a right to exist in its form as a repressive Baathist regime; some might argue that Sudan doesn’t have a right to exist now in it’s current genocidal incarnation. Broadly, the question is when states engage in sufficiently awful behavior that the international community can “legitimately” contemplate infringing on sovereignty. After thirty years of severely restricting the political and economic freedoms of a third of the population it controls, a serious (though perhaps not ultimately convincing) case can be made for Israel’s illegitimacy.

On many of these matters I’m obviously different from other Jews. They purport to speak for me when they insist on equating criticisms of Israel and challenges to Israel’s “right to exist” with Anti-Semitism, but my feelings obviously differ. As a result, despite my cultural and philosophical loyalty to Judaism, I’m stuck outside of the political debates. I’m pleased for the possibility of high-level international discourse about Anti-Semitism, but concerned that noone will represent my voice, and that the absence of this kind of moderate perspective — which rigidly separates hatred of a group from hatred of a State — will make true reconciliation less likely.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Log in