Comments on: Disclaimer: Not Responsible for Content in My Aggregator http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/ "Some day somebody else besides me will call me by my stage name. They will ..." --They Might Be Giants Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:02:36 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: j Baumgart http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-612 j Baumgart Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:37:30 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-612 <a></a> Gosh, some guys will do anything in the hopes of seeing female nudity, won't they? ha ha ha

Gosh, some guys will do anything in the hopes of seeing female nudity, won’t they? ha ha ha

]]> By: Paul http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Paul Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:37:15 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-611 <a></a> I have got to start reading some of these blogs on J's Aggregator (Just like she suggests to do). :)

I have got to start reading some of these blogs on J’s Aggregator (Just like she suggests to do). :)

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-610 Anonymous Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:41:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-610 <a></a> What a fuzz over a pair of tits..

What a fuzz over a pair of tits..

]]> By: j Baumgart http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-609 j Baumgart Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:05:15 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-609 <a></a> Oh, Michael, I'm disappointed to read that you edited the photo. (Maybe I'm too liberal when it comes to free speech.)

Oh, Michael, I’m disappointed to read that you edited the photo. (Maybe I’m too liberal when it comes to free speech.)

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-608 Anonymous Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:02:29 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-608 <a></a> I, too, got Whoops'd at work. I definitely would have had some explaining to do... But, Michael, I still love you, man :-)

I, too, got Whoops’d at work. I definitely would have had some explaining to do…

But, Michael, I still love you, man :-)

]]> By: Dowbrigade http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-607 Dowbrigade Sat, 10 Jan 2004 05:49:32 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-607 <a></a> I have edited the offending photo. I ws surprised it caused a fuss as 1) it came from a major media outlet (albeit British) 2) It;s purpose was to raise money for a worthy charity, which I linked to Hope the edited version goes down easier Dowbrigade

I have edited the offending photo. I ws surprised it caused a fuss as

1) it came from a major media outlet (albeit British)
2) It;s purpose was to raise money for a worthy charity, which I linked to

Hope the edited version goes down easier

Dowbrigade

]]> By: j Baumgart http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-606 j Baumgart Sat, 10 Jan 2004 04:14:15 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-606 <a></a> I just resubscribed to the feed a little while ago. When I first saw the post, it was at the top of my aggregator. Now, it's about 1/3 of the way down. I don't think it would have bothered some of my coworkers, but I don't want to take that chance. (Another reason why having a private office is a good thing.)

I just resubscribed to the feed a little while ago. When I first saw the post, it was at the top of my aggregator. Now, it’s about 1/3 of the way down. I don’t think it would have bothered some of my coworkers, but I don’t want to take that chance. (Another reason why having a private office is a good thing.)

]]> By: vernica http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-content-in-my-aggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-605 vernica Sat, 10 Jan 2004 04:03:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2004/01/09/disclaimer-not-responsible-for-conte#comment-605 <a></a> I was similarly surprised by that post when I glimpsed it in my aggregator. Fortunately, I noticed that it was not work safe before I scrolled the picture into complete view . . . Somehow, I do not think my co-workers would have been amused. Sadly, I have had to remove that feed from my aggregator. Although the problem image has since scrolled off my aggregator page, I do not want to risk another incident (or near incident) . . . I was just musing this morning that I have fallen in love with my job; I would hate to lose it because of my aggregator :-).

I was similarly surprised by that post when I glimpsed it in my aggregator. Fortunately, I noticed that it was not work safe before I scrolled the picture into complete view . . . Somehow, I do not think my co-workers would have been amused.

Sadly, I have had to remove that feed from my aggregator. Although the problem image has since scrolled off my aggregator page, I do not want to risk another incident (or near incident) . . . I was just musing this morning that I have fallen in love with my job; I would hate to lose it because of my aggregator :-) .

]]>