Christina on Wikipedia’s Authority
I was hopping through the blogosphere last night and came across a number of posts on Christina’s LIS Rant about Wikipedia’s authority in light of the recent discussion when several bloggers sabotaged the source to learn how quickly it would rebound.
- Frustration with accuracy by formula
- I’m not the only one rushing to defend Wikipedia
- Correction: “do no harm” is not the standard for human subjects research
Christina makes some great points about evaluating sources. I have also taught people how to evaluate sources and use some of the criteria Christina does.
Now that my main aggregator can handle Atom feeds, I’ve subscribed to her feed.
