Who’s Who in America

I remembered late Friday I needed to complete and return my nomination form for Who’s Who in America by Monday. Even though typing was a bit painful, I managed to cut and paste most of what they wanted from my resume into their online form and submit it yesterday.

It reminded me a bit of blogging: “How much personal information do I want to include about myself in the entry? Should I ask my parents if they want me to claim them as mine in a reference work that will circulate around the globe before listing them in the entry? Do I want to reveal anything that will reveal where I live?”

I omitted a lot of really personal stuff and pretty much included directory information that can be found about me in various sources already.

Under creative works, I listed this weblog.

My application on the whole seemed pretty empty. I’m trying not to have one of those “I have really done nothing with my life” moments. I’ve done a lot that doesn’t fit with their collection guidelines. There’s no “Explain in twenty words or fewer why we should include you in the book,” so I imagine I’m going to get dropped because on their paper, I look like nothing special. I wanted to at least say “I’m one of the few librarians with a really funky, unique job in which I’ve become a specialist in 8 years” or “I run one of the most popular news librarian weblogs” or “I contribute to 30 weblogs on 6 platforms” or “Please let me in so my Mom can be proud of me.”

But at least I won’t get dropped because I am a Z list blogger. I wonder how many of the A listers got nominations …

You post content; they get revenue:
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

2 Responses to “Who’s Who in America”

  1. Walt Crawford Says:

    I wouldn’t worry about it.

    My worklife hasn’t exactly been stellar (same job classification for 25 years now…and really no high-profile work), and the form Who’s Who used five years ago didn’t allow me to enter most of the stuff I’ve done (only three books, almost no scholarly articles, two little awards)–but that seemed to be good enough (I’ve been in WWiA since the 2001 edition). (My understanding is that one of the awards was one they track, and my returned form was good enough to qualify.)

    And blogging certainly had nothing to do with it…

  2. j Baumgart Says:

    Oh, I’m not worried about it at all. I’m just curious to see what will happen.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress