<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t forget about David Weinberger&#8217;s book release talk &#38; party Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2007/04/29/dont-forget-about-david-weinbergers-book-release-talk-party-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2007/04/29/dont-forget-about-david-weinbergers-book-release-talk-party-monday/</link>
	<description>"All that is left to me is the sound of snow underfoot." --Haruki Murakami</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: j&#39;s scratchpad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why aren&#8217;t library catalogs more Web 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2007/04/29/dont-forget-about-david-weinbergers-book-release-talk-party-monday/#comment-5357</link>
		<dc:creator>j&#39;s scratchpad &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why aren&#8217;t library catalogs more Web 2.0?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jkbaumga/2007/04/29/dont-forget-about-david-weinbergers-#comment-5357</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the questions after David Weinberger&#8217;s talk Monday is why library catalogs don&#8217;t have more features like some of the Web 2.0 tools and Web sites like Amazon have. What would be so wrong with suggestions like &#8220;People who read this book also read &#8230;&#8221; or informal book reviews and tagging integrated into catalogs? Privacy issues, especially in the post-9/11 world, jumped into my head immediately. Laws and librarians&#8217; professional ethics place great importance on library customer confidentiality. In systems with a very large patron base, it might not be so difficult to trace a list of books and figure out who might have checked them all out. However, in small town libraries, being able to do that might not be so difficult. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the questions after David Weinberger&#8217;s talk Monday is why library catalogs don&#8217;t have more features like some of the Web 2.0 tools and Web sites like Amazon have. What would be so wrong with suggestions like &#8220;People who read this book also read &#8230;&#8221; or informal book reviews and tagging integrated into catalogs? Privacy issues, especially in the post-9/11 world, jumped into my head immediately. Laws and librarians&#8217; professional ethics place great importance on library customer confidentiality. In systems with a very large patron base, it might not be so difficult to trace a list of books and figure out who might have checked them all out. However, in small town libraries, being able to do that might not be so difficult. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
