Property Law Developments—Joseph William Singer

Post Information

You are reading No compensation when city takes private sewer system. You can leave a comment or trackback this post.

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Pages

  • About
  • Home
  • Site admin

Categories

  • Adverse possession (3)
  • Antidiscrimination law (17)
  • Co-ops (1)
  • Consumer protection (8)
  • Copyright (1)
  • Due process (1)
  • Easements (2)
  • Environmental law (3)
  • Estates & future interests (7)
  • Fair Housing Act (13)
  • Intellectual property (2)
  • Leaseholds (7)
  • Legal theory (1)
  • Marital property (13)
  • Mortgages (32)
  • Nuisance (5)
  • Personal property (1)
  • Real estate transactions (26)
  • Religious freedom (1)
  • Restraints on alienation (6)
  • Servitudes (11)
  • Sexual orientation (11)
  • Statute of frauds (17)
  • Takings (14)
  • Title issues (4)
  • Trespass (7)
  • Tribal property (6)
  • Trusts (1)
  • Water rights (1)
  • Wills and inheritance (2)
  • Zoning (6)
  • Blogroll

    • DIRT
    • Law of the Land
    • Law Professor Blogs Network
    • National Indian Law Library (NARF)
    • Native American Law Blog
    • PropertyProf Blog
    • Religious Left Law
    • Sexual Orientation and the Law Blog
    • Turtle Talk
Feed for Property Law Developments—Joseph William Singer

Site Meta

  • css
  • xhtml 1.0
  • WordPress
  • Vistered Little Theme
  • Packaged by Edublogs - education blogs.

No compensation when city takes private sewer system

Posted on January 26th, 2011 by Joseph William Singer.
Categories: Takings.

A court in Massachusetts has held that no compensation is due when a city takes a private sewer system. North Adams Apartments, L.P. v. City of North Adams, 2011 Mass. App. LEXIS 41 (App. Ct. 2011). The court held that the transfer of title from the private owner to the city caused the owner no pecuniary loss; indeed, it benefited the owner by transferring maintenance obligations from the owner to the city. The court also noted that developers frequently created sewer hook-ups and then voluntarily (and without compensation) sought to transfer title to the municipality. Although one might think that loss of control of the sewer connections would constitute a property loss, the court’s factual finding was that there was no reduction in fair market value of the property and no economic value to the land owner in retaining ownership of the sewer connections.

0 comments.