Post Information
You are reading No taking of property without just compensation when property of an innocent owner is damaged from a lawful police search. You can leave a comment or trackback this post.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | Mar » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | ||||||
Pages
Categories
- Adverse possession (3)
- Antidiscrimination law (17)
- Co-ops (1)
- Consumer protection (8)
- Copyright (1)
- Due process (1)
- Easements (2)
- Environmental law (3)
- Estates & future interests (7)
- Fair Housing Act (13)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Leaseholds (7)
- Legal theory (1)
- Marital property (13)
- Mortgages (32)
- Nuisance (5)
- Personal property (1)
- Real estate transactions (26)
- Religious freedom (1)
- Restraints on alienation (6)
- Servitudes (11)
- Sexual orientation (11)
- Statute of frauds (17)
- Takings (14)
- Title issues (4)
- Trespass (7)
- Tribal property (6)
- Trusts (1)
- Water rights (1)
- Wills and inheritance (2)
- Zoning (6)
No taking of property without just compensation when property of an innocent owner is damaged from a lawful police search
Posted on February 11th, 2011 by Joseph William Singer.
Categories: Takings.
In conformity with the rule prevailing in most states, a New Jersey trial court held that an innocent owner whose property was damaged as a result of a lawful police search has no right to compensation under the takings clause. Simmons v. Loose, 2011 N.J. Super. LEXIS 16 (2011).
0 comments.