Property Law Developments—Joseph William Singer » Blog Archive » South Carolina prohibits transfer fee covenants

You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Meta:

Blogroll

Recent Posts

The Property Law Developments Blog has moved
Federal District Court orders cancellation of R-skins trademark registration
Massachusetts state law requires covenants to be structured as renewable or they are limited to 30 years
Nuisance claim against nuclear weapons plant proceeds
Supreme Court finds fundamental liberty and equality interests in extending right to marry to same-sex couples
Supreme Courts affirms disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act (with a caveat)
Tribe’s aboriginal title claim fails because it did not present a claim to a state agency in 1851
Takings clause applies to physical seizure of personal property
California Supreme Court Upholds San Jose Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance Against a Takings Challenge
Foreclosure complaint can subject law firm & bank to a claim for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)

Search

South Carolina prohibits transfer fee covenants

July 7th, 2013 by Joseph William Singer

South Carolina joins the growing list of jurisdictions that bans transfer fee covenants. 2012 S.C. Acts 106, codified at S.C. Code §27-1-70.

Posted in Consumer protection, Real estate transactions, Restraints on alienation, Servitudes | Comments Off on South Carolina prohibits transfer fee covenants

Comments are closed.