Co-ops
You are looking at posts in the category Co-ops.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
Pages
Categories
- Adverse possession (3)
- Antidiscrimination law (15)
- Co-ops (1)
- Consumer protection (4)
- Copyright (1)
- Due process (1)
- Easements (1)
- Environmental law (2)
- Estates & future interests (2)
- Fair Housing Act (12)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Leaseholds (5)
- Legal theory (1)
- Marital property (11)
- Mortgages (28)
- Nuisance (5)
- Personal property (1)
- Real estate transactions (16)
- Religious freedom (1)
- Restraints on alienation (3)
- Servitudes (9)
- Sexual orientation (10)
- Statute of frauds (16)
- Takings (13)
- Title issues (4)
- Trespass (6)
- Tribal property (6)
- Trusts (1)
- Wills and inheritance (2)
- Zoning (5)
Co-ops accused of racial bias
Posted on February 22nd, 2010 by Joseph William Singer.
Categories: Antidiscrimination law, Co-ops, Fair Housing Act, Restraints on alienation.
Two Bronx communities organized as co-ops require references from three co-op members in order to buy units. After using testers, the Fair Housing Justice Center has filed a lawsuit arguing that this requirement has a discriminatory effect when existing co-op members are overwhelmingly white and when the requirement was not consistently applied. Read article.
Comments Off