Co-ops
You are looking at posts in the category Co-ops.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Pages
Categories
- Adverse possession (5)
- Antidiscrimination law (22)
- Co-ops (1)
- Consumer protection (15)
- Copyright (1)
- Due process (2)
- Easements (6)
- Environmental law (4)
- Estates & future interests (8)
- Fair Housing Act (15)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Leaseholds (9)
- Legal theory (1)
- Marital property (17)
- Mortgages (36)
- Nuisance (7)
- Personal property (2)
- Real estate transactions (35)
- Religious freedom (2)
- Restraints on alienation (6)
- Servitudes (15)
- Sexual orientation (14)
- Statute of frauds (17)
- Takings (17)
- Title issues (8)
- Trespass (9)
- Tribal property (7)
- Trusts (1)
- Water rights (2)
- Wills and inheritance (3)
- Zoning (8)
Co-ops accused of racial bias
Posted on February 22nd, 2010 by Joseph William Singer.
Categories: Antidiscrimination law, Co-ops, Fair Housing Act, Restraints on alienation.
Two Bronx communities organized as co-ops require references from three co-op members in order to buy units. After using testers, the Fair Housing Justice Center has filed a lawsuit arguing that this requirement has a discriminatory effect when existing co-op members are overwhelmingly white and when the requirement was not consistently applied. Read article.
Comments Off