America’s Libertarian Pendulum

I wrote a piece for Guernica on the regular reappearance of libertarianism in America. Here’s the key idea I wanted to get across:

These tensions [between majoritarian politics and unassailable individual freedoms] are largely inherent to our political system, and as long as we have a liberal democracy, they cannot be finally resolved. Libertarian arguments will keep coming back, because majoritarian politics will always be unsatisfying or objectionable to some subset of the population. Transforming a policy dispute into constitutional or higher order debate about individual rights provides a mechanism for resisting majoritarian abuse, but it can also undermine the potential power of a political majority and make a country ungovernable. And as we are now seeing, this ability to reframe politics as a battle between the individual and the state also contains the explosive potential to escalate simple politics into a constitutional crisis. Billionaire funders and government ineptness aside, libertarianism is in the air because the line between private power and public accountability is being redrawn.

2 thoughts on “America’s Libertarian Pendulum

  1. When you say that politics has been reframed, you are suggesting that politics has not changed so much as the way it is being considered has changed. Fair enough. So, then, there are at least two viewpoints on politics, one is the libertarian one, and the other is the one that it has been reframed _from_, but which you do not outline here. Here are my questions for you: What is the other frame? Which is a more accurate view? Why is it the more accurate?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>