Comments on: A War to End War? http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/ Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:42:42 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-11394 Anonymous Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:55:39 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-11394 <a></a> Your site is very informational for me. Nice work.

Your site is very informational for me. Nice work.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-11393 Anonymous Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:28:51 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-11393 <a></a> I found your page from google but i like it so much

I found your page from google but i like it so much

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10986 Anonymous Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:25:09 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10986 <a></a> Clubbing Clothes

Clubbing Clothes

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10915 Anonymous Wed, 07 Sep 2005 13:52:48 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10915 <a></a> Boat Racing

Boat Racing

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10909 Anonymous Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:51:06 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10909 <a></a> Airline Aviation News

Airline Aviation News

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10904 Anonymous Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:39:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10904 <a></a> Paper Airplane

Paper Airplane

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10465 Anonymous Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:42:27 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10465 <a></a> Chris, we don't need you. We already have Bill Moyers. But wait! We do need you, because it would be delightful to see the two of you go to war over who can denigrate Bush more.

Chris, we don’t need you. We already have Bill Moyers. But wait! We do need you, because it would be delightful to see the two of you go to war over who can denigrate Bush more.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10416 Anonymous Thu, 03 Apr 2003 19:31:17 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10416 <a></a> I've been trying to suss out how it is that you liberal folks can have such bizarre notions as a near "universal peace movement." Your "indispensable sources" provide the best clue that I've come across, thus far. Hey, try giving <a href="http://www.instapundit.com">Instapundit</a> a look.

I’ve been trying to suss out how it is that you liberal folks can have such bizarre notions as a near “universal peace movement.” Your “indispensable sources” provide the best clue that I’ve come across, thus far.

Hey, try giving Instapundit a look.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10415 Anonymous Wed, 02 Apr 2003 20:30:24 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10415 <a></a> I was sure that this was meant as an April fool joke but Searls seems to take it seriously. The hope that there will be no war because the neo-cons are unpopular is .... amusingly insane to be sure. "Neo-con adventurers" rolls off the tongue and probably appeals to the kind of mind that had a fondness for "running dog capitalists". Unfortunately, since neo-cons only have existed since the early 90's, and warfare since before agriculture, this "thought" is best served on April 1 only. I wonder if you understand what "losing the peace" means in reality? Won't be good for the Iraqi's for sure. But then you guys never meant to include peace for them anyways did you? Hoping this is an April 1 joke, if only to try keep some tiny respect for Searls.

I was sure that this was meant as an April fool joke but Searls seems to take it seriously. The hope that there will be no war because the neo-cons are unpopular is …. amusingly insane to be sure. “Neo-con adventurers” rolls off the tongue and probably appeals to the kind of mind that had a fondness for “running dog capitalists”. Unfortunately, since neo-cons only have existed since the early 90’s, and warfare since before agriculture, this “thought” is best served on April 1 only.

I wonder if you understand what “losing the peace” means in reality? Won’t be good for the Iraqi’s for sure. But then you guys never meant to include peace for them anyways did you? Hoping this is an April 1 joke, if only to try keep some tiny respect for Searls.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/comment-page-1/#comment-10414 Anonymous Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:51:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/04/01/a-war-to-end-war/#comment-10414 <a></a> Good, good stuff! And I like your news sources. Did you see the Op-Ed in, I think, the Sunday Times that gives some heavy mention to "The Virginian", vis a vis GWB's misinterpretation of the cowboy ethic? I need about seven hours catch-up with my Daddy! Maybe this weekend, avec Miranda.

Good, good stuff! And I like your news sources. Did you see the Op-Ed in, I think, the Sunday Times that gives some heavy mention to “The Virginian”, vis a vis GWB’s misinterpretation of the cowboy ethic?

I need about seven hours catch-up with my Daddy! Maybe this weekend, avec Miranda.

]]>