<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spoken Word: What do they know of blogging&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-11559</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-11559</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Dear Buyers,
 Buy Nokia,N70,N80,N90,N91,N92,N93,6600,6680,8800,9300,9500,Motorola Razr V3i, Nextel i930.New T-Mobile Sidekick3.Nokia 1261 Nokia 2100 Nokia 2220 Nokia 2260 Nokia 2300 Nokia 2300a Nokia 3100 Nokia 3100b Nokia 3108 Nokia 3200 Nokia 3210 Nokia 3285 Nokia 3300 Nokia 3300b Nokia 3310 Nokia 3315 Nokia 3320 Nokia 3330 Nokia 3350 Nokia 3360 Nokia 3390 Nokia 3395 Nokia 3410 Nokia 3510 Nokia 3510i Nokia 3520 Nokia 3530 Nokia 3560 Nokia 3585 Nokia 3590 Nokia 3595 Nokia 3600 Nokia 3610 Nokia 3620 Nokia 3650 Nokia 3660 Nokia 3810 Nokia 5100 Nokia 5100a Nokia 5110i Nokia 5120 Nokia 5125 Nokia 5130 Nokia 5148 Nokia 5160 Nokia 5180 Nokia 5185 Nokia 5190 Nokia 5210 Nokia 5510 Nokia 6090 Nokia 6100 Nokia 6108 Nokia 6110i Nokia 6120 Nokia 6130 Nokia 6138 Nokia 6150e Nokia 6160 Nokia 6162 Nokia 6185 Nokia 6188 Nokia 6190 Nokia 6200 Nokia 6210 Nokia 6220 Nokia 6250 Nokia 6310 Nokia 6310i Nokia 6340 Nokia 6340i Nokia 6360 Nokia 6500 Nokia 6510 Nokia 6560 Nokia 6590 Nokia 6590i Nokia 6610 Nokia 6650 Nokia 6800 Nokia 6800a Nokia 6810 Nokia 6820 Nokia 6820b Nokia 7110 Nokia 7160 Nokia 7190 Nokia 7200 Nokia 7210 Nokia 7250 Nokia 7250i Nokia 7600 Nokia 7650 Nokia 8110i Nokia 8146 Nokia 8148i Nokia 8210 Nokia 8260 Nokia 8270 Nokia 8290 Nokia 8310 Nokia 8390 Nokia 8810 Nokia 8850 Nokia 8855 Nokia 8860 Nokia 8890 Nokia 8910 Nokia 8910i Nokia 9210i Nokia 9250 Nokia.

And Manymore At Very Low Price.Ok
Contact The Following Blow: 
Email:   globalphonesltd@yahoo.com
Email:   globalphonesltd@yahoo.com
Thanks And God Bless
Mr.John Scott
Director.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Dear Buyers,<br />
 Buy Nokia,N70,N80,N90,N91,N92,N93,6600,6680,8800,9300,9500,Motorola Razr V3i, Nextel i930.New T-Mobile Sidekick3.Nokia 1261 Nokia 2100 Nokia 2220 Nokia 2260 Nokia 2300 Nokia 2300a Nokia 3100 Nokia 3100b Nokia 3108 Nokia 3200 Nokia 3210 Nokia 3285 Nokia 3300 Nokia 3300b Nokia 3310 Nokia 3315 Nokia 3320 Nokia 3330 Nokia 3350 Nokia 3360 Nokia 3390 Nokia 3395 Nokia 3410 Nokia 3510 Nokia 3510i Nokia 3520 Nokia 3530 Nokia 3560 Nokia 3585 Nokia 3590 Nokia 3595 Nokia 3600 Nokia 3610 Nokia 3620 Nokia 3650 Nokia 3660 Nokia 3810 Nokia 5100 Nokia 5100a Nokia 5110i Nokia 5120 Nokia 5125 Nokia 5130 Nokia 5148 Nokia 5160 Nokia 5180 Nokia 5185 Nokia 5190 Nokia 5210 Nokia 5510 Nokia 6090 Nokia 6100 Nokia 6108 Nokia 6110i Nokia 6120 Nokia 6130 Nokia 6138 Nokia 6150e Nokia 6160 Nokia 6162 Nokia 6185 Nokia 6188 Nokia 6190 Nokia 6200 Nokia 6210 Nokia 6220 Nokia 6250 Nokia 6310 Nokia 6310i Nokia 6340 Nokia 6340i Nokia 6360 Nokia 6500 Nokia 6510 Nokia 6560 Nokia 6590 Nokia 6590i Nokia 6610 Nokia 6650 Nokia 6800 Nokia 6800a Nokia 6810 Nokia 6820 Nokia 6820b Nokia 7110 Nokia 7160 Nokia 7190 Nokia 7200 Nokia 7210 Nokia 7250 Nokia 7250i Nokia 7600 Nokia 7650 Nokia 8110i Nokia 8146 Nokia 8148i Nokia 8210 Nokia 8260 Nokia 8270 Nokia 8290 Nokia 8310 Nokia 8390 Nokia 8810 Nokia 8850 Nokia 8855 Nokia 8860 Nokia 8890 Nokia 8910 Nokia 8910i Nokia 9210i Nokia 9250 Nokia.</p>
<p>And Manymore At Very Low Price.Ok<br />
Contact The Following Blow:<br />
Email:   <a href="mailto:globalphonesltd@yahoo.com">globalphonesltd@yahoo.com</a><br />
Email:   <a href="mailto:globalphonesltd@yahoo.com">globalphonesltd@yahoo.com</a><br />
Thanks And God Bless<br />
Mr.John Scott<br />
Director.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-11392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-11392</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I found your page from google but i like it so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I found your page from google but i like it so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-11009</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-11009</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Rubber Roof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Rubber Roof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-10933</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-10933</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Dog Care</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Dog Care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-10677</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-10677</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I am in agreement that We have gaps in our defense Policies and 9/11 proved that.  A question that is on my mind is why does it take so long to react to a situation.  Just as Scarry said the passengers of Flight 93 identified the problem, deliberated and voted, and then acted.  Sacrificing there lives from a possible would-be catastrophe.  However, I am afraid of the idea of citizens being a bit more involved.  That is almost a call to arms.  I just see militias forming and the breaching of Pandora's Box.  I don't agree with to much citizen responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I am in agreement that We have gaps in our defense Policies and 9/11 proved that.  A question that is on my mind is why does it take so long to react to a situation.  Just as Scarry said the passengers of Flight 93 identified the problem, deliberated and voted, and then acted.  Sacrificing there lives from a possible would-be catastrophe.  However, I am afraid of the idea of citizens being a bit more involved.  That is almost a call to arms.  I just see militias forming and the breaching of Pandora&#8217;s Box.  I don&#8217;t agree with to much citizen responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-10596</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-10596</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I found Elaine Scarry's contrast between the action oriented response of the passengers on the plane headed for the Pentagon versus the DoD's lack of response in defending the Pentagon itself interesting, although I assume Ms. Scarry is a philosopher rather than a military decision maker.  SUre, today, any stray plane with the characteristics she defines would be shot down, but on 9/10/01 our world was different.

I was more interested in Elaine Scarry's comments on the hypocrisy of US insistence that other countries be invaded because they possess Weapons of Mass Distruction while the US undoubtedly possess the world's largest collection of WMDs.  We see now, that no WMDs have been found, that other reasons for the invasion of Iraq are being invented.  Don't get me wrong: Sadam was a bad guy and deserved to be ousted, but, let's be truthful about why we do things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I found Elaine Scarry&#8217;s contrast between the action oriented response of the passengers on the plane headed for the Pentagon versus the DoD&#8217;s lack of response in defending the Pentagon itself interesting, although I assume Ms. Scarry is a philosopher rather than a military decision maker.  SUre, today, any stray plane with the characteristics she defines would be shot down, but on 9/10/01 our world was different.</p>
<p>I was more interested in Elaine Scarry&#8217;s comments on the hypocrisy of US insistence that other countries be invaded because they possess Weapons of Mass Distruction while the US undoubtedly possess the world&#8217;s largest collection of WMDs.  We see now, that no WMDs have been found, that other reasons for the invasion of Iraq are being invented.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong: Sadam was a bad guy and deserved to be ousted, but, let&#8217;s be truthful about why we do things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-10576</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 05:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-10576</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

(1) The Pentagon is not responsible for defending the country from internal attacks.  And it's a good thing too, having to keep the FBI on the 'right side' of the line between effectivness and paranoid/oppression is hard enough.
(2) A second point on the Pentagon not being able to defend the Pentagon: remember the Vincennes?  Or, how many harmless airliners are you willing to shoot down to get all of the hijacked airlines?  To get 90% of the hijacked airliners?  50%?  (Lucky for us we don't have that many WTC's and Pentagons to ram.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>(1) The Pentagon is not responsible for defending the country from internal attacks.  And it&#8217;s a good thing too, having to keep the FBI on the &#8216;right side&#8217; of the line between effectivness and paranoid/oppression is hard enough.<br />
(2) A second point on the Pentagon not being able to defend the Pentagon: remember the Vincennes?  Or, how many harmless airliners are you willing to shoot down to get all of the hijacked airlines?  To get 90% of the hijacked airliners?  50%?  (Lucky for us we don&#8217;t have that many WTC&#8217;s and Pentagons to ram.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blogging/#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2003 00:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydondev/2003/07/29/spoken-word-what-do-they-know-of-blo#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Well, I'll comment. This is an intriguing take on the 9/11 events. Comparison b/w the decision making that might have gone on in a bureaucratic/lethargic/inertial system (Pentagon) with a Democratic/nimble/dynamic system (passenger network inside the plane) is _fresh_ to say the least. 

The standing army vs. "drafted" army is a good argument as well. Right now it seems, American citizens enlist in the Army _not_ to go oppress other nations. They are sent out in the name of freedom, liberty, right-to-use-bleached-toilet-paper or whatever the heck is the anti-enemy-slogan du jour. Believing that they are doing a good thing. That doesn't take away from the damage that they are a part of, creators of, and instruments of. Why/how is another blog altogether, but ignorance and complacency on part of the citizenry is reason One. 

Looking at "defense" from the stop-gap, band-aid point of view (as done currently) is disasterous IMO. Defense has to be "holistic" (if you can stomach the term). It has to be Defence and not Warmaking in Peace's clothing. Citizens mobilizing to defend the country. That would mean American citizenry getting themselves off the cruise-control, give time to the affairs of their country.

But, sadly, its not just about America anymore. America controls the fate of the world. People of America are proxy voters for the rest of us. Its a frightening prospect if you are looking from the outside in. The only hope (that at least I have) is in the libertarian tradition of the American psyche. and hopefully the citizenry will prevail in the face of absurdities ( and abberrations that have been gathering momentum in the preceding decades and seem to prevail today.

P.S. I have a category in my iPod called "Lydon's Interviews" Not too inventive, I know, but I'm saving all these. Just in case you get yanked off the air (I'm just paranoid prolly). 1/2 hour seems so short. Maybe you should do 1 hour interviews? Would you Interview Gore V. or Chomsky? give _them_ a taste of the blogging world?

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ll comment. This is an intriguing take on the 9/11 events. Comparison b/w the decision making that might have gone on in a bureaucratic/lethargic/inertial system (Pentagon) with a Democratic/nimble/dynamic system (passenger network inside the plane) is _fresh_ to say the least. </p>
<p>The standing army vs. &#8220;drafted&#8221; army is a good argument as well. Right now it seems, American citizens enlist in the Army _not_ to go oppress other nations. They are sent out in the name of freedom, liberty, right-to-use-bleached-toilet-paper or whatever the heck is the anti-enemy-slogan du jour. Believing that they are doing a good thing. That doesn&#8217;t take away from the damage that they are a part of, creators of, and instruments of. Why/how is another blog altogether, but ignorance and complacency on part of the citizenry is reason One. </p>
<p>Looking at &#8220;defense&#8221; from the stop-gap, band-aid point of view (as done currently) is disasterous IMO. Defense has to be &#8220;holistic&#8221; (if you can stomach the term). It has to be Defence and not Warmaking in Peace&#8217;s clothing. Citizens mobilizing to defend the country. That would mean American citizenry getting themselves off the cruise-control, give time to the affairs of their country.</p>
<p>But, sadly, its not just about America anymore. America controls the fate of the world. People of America are proxy voters for the rest of us. Its a frightening prospect if you are looking from the outside in. The only hope (that at least I have) is in the libertarian tradition of the American psyche. and hopefully the citizenry will prevail in the face of absurdities ( and abberrations that have been gathering momentum in the preceding decades and seem to prevail today.</p>
<p>P.S. I have a category in my iPod called &#8220;Lydon&#8217;s Interviews&#8221; Not too inventive, I know, but I&#8217;m saving all these. Just in case you get yanked off the air (I&#8217;m just paranoid prolly). 1/2 hour seems so short. Maybe you should do 1 hour interviews? Would you Interview Gore V. or Chomsky? give _them_ a taste of the blogging world?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
