Skip to content

Harold Bloom: Culture Gods from Emerson to Bird

     “If God appeared in 19th Century America,” Harold Bloom told me, ”it was as Ralph Waldo Emerson.  In the 20th Century it would have been as Charlie Parker.”


     Who knew that Yale’s monumental literature man was a bebopper?  No mere record collector, either.  Bloom remembers haunting Minton’s and other Harlem hatcheries of the new jazz in the 1940s.  A half century ago he handed the collected poems of one idol, Hart Crane, to another, the pianist Bud Powell, whose “Un Poco Loco” is short-listed with, say, Moby Dick and The Scarlet Letter among Bloom’s all-time all-American aesthetic statements.  And in our long conversation Professor Bloom spelled out exactly what he thinks the connections are.


     The Sage of New Haven helped revive the late Sage of Concord in the 1960s.  This summer, Emerson’s 200th, it is Bloom’s effusive devotion that rules the international birthday party.  Bloom does not quite confer supremacy on Emerson, though he believes Emerson made our greatest writer, Walt Whitman, possible.  Emerson made the rest of our literary culture (Emily Dickinson to Henry James to Robert Frost to Don DeLillo) possible, necessary and perhaps inevitable.  “The whole phenomenon of American culture,” said Bloom, “on every level down to popular culture… is a profoundly Emersonian affair.  He has prophesied everything…  He is the mind of America.  He is not only the first absolutely original mind to appear in the United States, but he usurped everything that could be peculiarly American about thought as such.”


     It is Bloom’s way to digress, and by the end of an afternoon we had littered acres of artistic ground with scores and scores of dropped names.  Part One of this conversation is a modern walk in the Emersonian woods, lit by Bloom’s astonishing memory for people and lines and history, and with several touches of Bloom’s high style of invective.  Richard Rorty and the late Bart Giamatti come up as good guys; Dubya, Cheney and Rummy as fools; Robert Penn Warren and Allen Ginsberg as departed friends with whom the voluble Bloom is still arguing.  Part Two is not least a catalog of people who hated Emerson (Southerners in his lifetime and ever after, including C. Vann Woodward, Allen Tate and “Red” Warren; but also T. S. Eliot and even Herman Melville, who mocked Emerson in his fiction) and those who loved him and/or owed him (including W. E. B. DuBois, William James, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Henry David Thoreau, Wallace Stevens,  the Argentinian Jorge Luis Borges and the American novelist of Invisible Man, Ralph Waldo Ellison).  Part Three is contemporary and personal.  It was my Emersonian confession, “he speaks to me,” that prompted Harold Bloom.  Lost and depressed in his own dark wood in his mid-thirties, Bloom said, he had read forward and back in Emerson’s Journals “morning noon and night and all night long,” and “I felt that every phrase he had ever written he was speaking directly to me…  I still feel that way,” he said.  “There are many many sentences in which I feel that Emerson is more than speaking to me.  He has gotten inside my inner ear and has become indeed the the best and oldest part of myself.  Indeed, it is the God within, as it were, that speaks.”


     Who speaks with Emerson’s range and affirmation in our lifetimes?  I tried on Professor Bloom my notion that Duke Ellington cut his own original Emersonian figure for the 20th Century.  An enabler who was both major composer and itinerant performance artist, in long forms and short, for dance halls and cathedrals, Ellington was a blues man of surpassing public style and inner ecstasies.  It intrigues me that both Emerson and Ellington were towering individualists set each in his own band of eccentric voices–Ellington in his orchestra, Emerson in the Concord circle.  Harold Bloom was wide open to transferring the modern Emerson search into the music world, but his taste is for the blazing solo voices from Louis Armstrong to Sonny Rollins, with Charlie Parker presiding over the Pantheon.  Listen in.  OneTwo and Three.

{ 17 } Comments

  1. Anonymous | September 4, 2003 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    Talk about night and day, following up Robert Fisk with Harold Bloom.

  2. Anonymous | September 7, 2003 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    The egomanical “sage” of New Haven states that Don DeLillo wouldn’t have been posssible but for Emerson. Yeah right, just like Chris’ claim of entitlement to Public radio funds, had “nothing at all to do with money”.

  3. Anonymous | October 18, 2003 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Bloom is an enthusiast of the wonders that the mind is capable of, his meditations on Shakespeare and the creation of humanity - the ability of the Bard to create so many “selves” in his works - is merely one example. RWE is another natural for Bloom - an example of the unexperienced life is not worth living - an openness to experience.

    No, I don’t agree with many of Prof. Bloom’s judgments - but it is the journey, and not the destination that matters most here. If someone, disagreeing with Harold Bloom, can write as eloquently in favor of DeLillo, and draw people into the experience of his works, who is to say that a conversation hasn’t been started?

  4. Anonymous | November 2, 2003 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    What a revelation to hear how conversant and insightful Professor Bloom is on jazz. His description of Bud Powell as an “immensely literate man” is even more eye opening, though I’m not surprised to hear that he’s more passionate toward the incandescent modernists Bird and Bud than he is with Duke Ellington. Bloom’s citation of “Parker’s Mood” and “Un Poco Loco” are choice examples of their “doomed eagerness.”

    But I agree with Mr. Lydon, that Ellington is more Emersonian than Bird or Bud, both in terms of his robust, independent character, and in his stylization of the authentic American musical vernacular. The American grain infuses all of Duke’s work, as does a truly democratic spirit, both in the way he utilized the individual musical personalities of his band members, and in his embrace of the high and low, the sacred and profane, the most refined and the funkiest– in short, the multi-cultural vitality of America.

    Bloom’s friend Ralph Waldo Ellison noted that it was in our appreciation of and ongoing devotion to Ellington’s music that the truth of the “white American’s inescapable Negro-ness,” i.e., our unique American-ness, was most fully revealed.

    Tom Reney

  5. Anonymous | January 5, 2005 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    legal consulting

  6. Anonymous | February 25, 2005 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    I am a student creating a movie for a computer science fair. There will be no fees or money exchanged for this project. I need written permisson for all images and music I use. I will give credit as you request. The image is located at http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydon/2003/09/03 Plese e-mail me back asap either way.

    Thank you,
    Meghan Kissinger

  7. Anonymous | February 25, 2005 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    I am a student creating a movie for a computer science fair. There will be no fees or money exchanged for this project. I need written permisson for all images and music I use. I will give credit as you request. The image is located at http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydon/2003/09/03 Plese e-mail me back asap either way.

    Thank you,
    Meghan Kissinger

  8. Anonymous | February 25, 2005 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    I am a student creating a movie for a computer science fair. There will be no fees or money exchanged for this project. I need written permisson for all images and music I use. I will give credit as you request. The image is located at http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydon/2003/09/03 Plese e-mail me back asap either way.

    Thank you,
    Meghan Kissinger

  9. Anonymous | August 24, 2005 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    You are the best. Thank you http://www.bignews.com

  10. Anonymous | March 19, 2006 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Very nice and informative website.

  11. Anonymous | July 27, 2006 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    I would like to wish you much luck. And a lot of money. Thank you.

  12. Anonymous | August 27, 2006 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    I would like to wish you much luck. And a lot of money. Thank you.

  13. Anonymous | August 28, 2006 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Congratulations on a great web site. I am a new computer user and finding you was like coming home. Continued success.

  14. Anonymous | September 5, 2006 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    I would like to wish you much luck. And a lot of money. Thank you.

  15. Anonymous | September 12, 2006 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Congratulations on a great web site. I am a new computer user and finding you was like coming home. Continued success.

  16. Anonymous | September 18, 2006 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    I would like to wish you much luck. And a lot of money. Thank you.

  17. Mortgage | December 6, 2007 at 4:40 am | Permalink

    The refinancing is aggravated by the fact that most loans during your term in the same rates, or by increasing annuities to be repaid, the recorded refinancing resources but often end of the term, and during the agreement period in the same amount available, and with interest to be served. The business betraglichen congruence between loan and refinancing tries, in a holistic view of the entire loan portfolio, for example, in a Fristen- or layers balance into account.

    This is snippet. Continue Mortgage

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress