Wendy Seltzer, “Sacked by Copyright”

When Berkman Fellow and Chilling Effects founder Wendy Seltzer posted a Super Bowl clip to YouTube, she thought she’d get to teach a bit about copyright — the clip was the NFL’s warning that “Any other use of this telecast or of any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent, is prohibited.” In series of DMCA notices, copyright takedowns, counter-notifications, and put-backs, Seltzer has found the process more convoluted than even she anticipated. Join the discussion at the Berkman Center about the free expression stakes in Viacom v. YouTube: copyright, safe-harbors, and Chilling Effects.

Download the audio podcast (time: 1:10:31).

Brooklyn Law School, where she teaches Internet Law and Privacy. She was previously a staff attorney with Electronic Frontier Foundation, focused on intellectual property and free speech issues. She is a 1999 graduate of Harvard Law School and a 1996 graduate of Harvard College.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
previous:
Africa’s Internet Infrastructure Video Part II
next:
IS2K7 Interview with Michael Hemment

1 Comment »

  1. netzpolitik.org: » MediaBerkman-Podcast: Wendy Seltzer, “Sacked by Copyright” » Aktuelle Berichterstattung rund um die politischen Themen der Informationsgesellschaft.

    April 20, 2007 @ 10:25 am

    1

    […] Bei MediaBerkman gibt es wieder einen interessanten Podcast für die Weiterbildungsprogramm: Wendy Seltzer, “Sacked by Copyright”. When Berkman Fellow and Chilling Effects founder Wendy Seltzer posted a Super Bowl clip to YouTube, she thought she’d get to teach a bit about copyright — the clip was the NFL’s warning that “Any other use of this telecast or of any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL’s consent, is prohibited.” In series of DMCA notices, copyright takedowns, counter-notifications, and put-backs, Seltzer has found the process more convoluted than even she anticipated. Join the discussion at the Berkman Center about the free expression stakes in Viacom v. YouTube: copyright, safe-harbors, and Chilling Effects. […]

Leave a Comment

Maximum 2 links per comment. Do not use BBCode.
Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress