<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In search of some real online revenues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/</link>
	<description>From Beijing to Boston, thoughts on the future digital media world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:19:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bali Holidays</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Bali Holidays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>2 million dollars just from youtube? Wow, that&#039;s a lot of money. But agree with hugo, I think that only applicable to big players in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 million dollars just from youtube? Wow, that&#8217;s a lot of money. But agree with hugo, I think that only applicable to big players in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Santos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>2 million dollars? that is an impressive mark. But these royalties are only good to big players like avril, shakira, and so on.  Less known performers won&#039;t reach that count, and even if they reach a considerable one, they will never see that cheque...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 million dollars? that is an impressive mark. But these royalties are only good to big players like avril, shakira, and so on.  Less known performers won&#8217;t reach that count, and even if they reach a considerable one, they will never see that cheque&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maths</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Maths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediascrums/2008/08/02/in-search-of-some-real-online-revenues/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>It was a little disingenuous for Terry to state that there is a &quot;$2million cheque waiting&quot;, when it is a known fact the 200 million mark was obtained by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/avrils-fans-go-for-youtube-top-spot/2008/06/26/1214073406187.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gaming&lt;/a&gt; the system.
Likewise, the &quot;shitloads of money in China&quot; claim is a similar &quot;cheque is in the mail&quot; throwaway comment - the proof is in the pudding.

But it is rich irony that a content owner turned the tables and seized the opportunity for a money grab attempt off a content aggregator site when the modus operandi has been the latter gaming other people&#039;s content for riches of their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a little disingenuous for Terry to state that there is a &#8220;$2million cheque waiting&#8221;, when it is a known fact the 200 million mark was obtained by <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/web/avrils-fans-go-for-youtube-top-spot/2008/06/26/1214073406187.html" rel="nofollow">gaming</a> the system.<br />
Likewise, the &#8220;shitloads of money in China&#8221; claim is a similar &#8220;cheque is in the mail&#8221; throwaway comment &#8211; the proof is in the pudding.</p>
<p>But it is rich irony that a content owner turned the tables and seized the opportunity for a money grab attempt off a content aggregator site when the modus operandi has been the latter gaming other people&#8217;s content for riches of their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
