The — modern — realistic and credible and impressive justification for Israel
Posted by middleeast on 17th May 2008
[slightly revised to better comport with my intentions]
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1209627025568&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
2 Iyar 5768, Wednesday, May 7, 2008 2:46 IST

![]()
|
|
Sir, – Re Jacob Chinitz’s eloquent letter: The question of whether Jews have the “right” to a state is too abstract. Do the Cherokee and Iroquois and many Indian groups of North and South America have the right to a state? Do Basques, Sikhs, Jains and each of the innumerable tribes and groupings of India and sub-Saharan Africa, of western China, the former Soviet Union, and Afghanistan – the al-Qaida-run tribes of northern Pakistan?
The Iroquois used to have a nation in upstate New York. Do they have a right to return and reconstitute their state?
The answer to such a question must be based on realism and “how.” For example, people have the right to become wealthy, but not through bank robbery. It’s not whether Sikhs and Jains – or Jews – have the abstract “right to a state,” but the amount of cleansing, suffering, structural explosiveness and dangerously expanding conflict that carving one out would generate.
The Jewish state is based on recent, not ancient history. It is a messy right, as messy as the real world it reflects. It is undeniable that there could not have been a state without the Shoah. The State of Israel is based on 20th-century persecution, refugeeship and the unexpected self-destructiveness of the Arabs in their violence against the Jewish refugees.
These messy facts underscore the valid realistic rights that constitute the credible and the only believable – but deeply impressive and cogent – hasbara to the educated Western world.
JAMES ADLER
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »