Mark W. Shead

• How to download youtube videos.
• The concepts behind digital signatures and encryption.

A friend of mine is starting up a business selling Cupcake Towers.  Evidently cupcakes have been getting more and more fancy over the past few years and now they are even being used in place of cakes at wedding receptions.

It has been interesting watching my friends business grow.  Ten years ago starting something like that would have been very expensive.  Just getting setup with an e commerce site would have been very complicated.  There are so many tools available now that make it easy to start a business and get your products online.  The downside is that there is a lot more competition.  The upside is that you can spend more time concentrating on your product and marketing and less on just trying to get the infrastructure in place.

I think the next wave of e commerce is going to be wiring up people in third world countries.  When people in Africa can sell their wares directly on the Internet I think we will see a significant shift in how commerce is done. It will also mean an increase in customization.  If you are ordering a picture frame from someone living in a hut who plans to make it by hand, it makes sense to customize exactly what you want.  It seems strange, but for some types of things this might bring us full circle from craftsmen to assembly lines back to craftsmen again.

Microsoft’s newest ad campaign is puzzling. Watch this:

Link to movie because I can’t embed at Harvard

Apple has been making fun of PCs for awhile in their ads, so it is probably time for Microsoft to come back with something, but I don’t know that this is going to help them.

First, the add doesn’t even mention Microsoft’s products.  It is kind of like Goodyear advertising Toyotas because they come with Goodyear tires.  If Microsoft thinks their product (Vista, Windows 7, XP, etc.) is superior to OS X they ought to show the value of their products.  I like Apple and OS X, but I think there are some things Microsoft could really capitalize on.

Second, their current approach basically says that software is interchangeable and the only think you should look at is the hardware specs for the price.  If consumers take this type of approach to buying, Microsoft loses. A machine with Linux is generally cheaper than the equivalent machine with Windows.

Third, I don’t know that the “we are cheap” slogan works very well.  It is kind of like BWM saying “we are the ultimate driving experience” and Hyundi saying “Oh, yeah!  Well we are dirt cheap!”  Instead Hyundi has been saying “we are reliable and we will give you a warrantee to prove it.”

Apple is advertising their machines as non-commodities.  In this ad campaign Microsoft is trying to reinforce the idea that PCs are commodities and that the only difference is price.  In the end I don’t think this will help PC makers.  Which also means it won’t help Microsoft.

We tend to think of our memories as being something fixed and solid.  In reality, memory is fluid and often very unreliable.  We tend to remember what we want, what makes sense, and what makes use conform to our ideals about ourselves. 

In one experiment, people were shown two photographs and asked which one was more attractive.  Then through a slight of hand trick they were given the photograph that they had not chosen–the one they had decided was less attractive.  They were then asked to explain why they felt that photo was more attractive.

74% didn’t notice the switch.  Worse they came up with a bunch of reasons why they had chosen that photograph.  Their memories basically switched to make them believe that the photo they had been handed was the one they had chosen.

These three things may really change the face of web applications.  Google gears lets you store information locally so you can use your web application offline.  Right now the only program I know that uses Gears is Google Reader.  There is a standalone program for Windows and a Firefox program for OS X that will let you use the Gears capability.  With Google Reader it lets you download your feeds and read them offline.  The capabilities are very limited.  You can’t change the category of a feed.  It will only let you mark them as read and then sync.  Even with just this basic functionality it is a huge step forward in web applications.

This week it was announced that there would be no SDK for the iPhone.  Apple expects developers to just write web applications for anything on the iPhone.  Obviously this is pretty limiting–especially when the iPhone has been touted as running an actual version of OS X.  To help give people a way to test their applications, Apple released a beta version of Safari for Windows.

In Google’s discussion about Gears, they said that they are making a version for Safari.  If this happens and if it is something that Apple will incorporate into the iPhone, it could give developers the capability to create applications on the iPhone that go well beyond current web applications.

I read a story about a poll that was taken of high school students. The object was to find out how much they expected to make once they were out of college and had a few years of job experience. The average expected salary? $145,000 per year.

I think this may be one of the reasons that American’s accumulate so much debt. Students graduate and start spending money based on what they expect their salary to be–not necessarily what is realistic.

Within a few years they are deep in debt and looking for debt consolidation loans or other forms of credit help. By the time they come to the conclusion that they aren’t going to be making that much money the damage is done and they are deep in debt–beyond what that can fix by simply being financially frugal.

Google Crime

The act of doing something with your website that Google doesn’t like. Using paid links, cloaking, etc. are examples of Google Crime. Google crime is punishable by a penalty in their rankings or being dropped from their index entirely.

Google is asking people to submit sites that are selling or buying links.  This is an interesting move.  It sounds like their goal is to test some new algorithms that will automatically discount the value of links if it appears they have been purchased.  My guess is that they aren’t going to manually go through and penalize sites, they are just going to try to set the algorithms to discount any PR that comes from paid links.  At least that is what I hope they do.  It is possible that they may penalize sites for selling links or penalize sites for buying them.

This seems unlikely.  Google tends to favor algorithms over manual penalties.  It appears that their mindset is to make the Google results reflect what is popular on the web.  Since paid links are now part of the game, they will adjust their algorithms accordingly.

Here are some of the side effects I think this will have:

• Lists of links will lose a lot of value.  Blogrolls and the like will probably stop passing as much PR because they tend to be formatted and placed in ways that is similar to paid links.
• Editorial links will probably become more valuable. People will probably sell incontent links instead of just links on the side of the page to help make the links keep their value.
• Some pay-per-post type sites may stop requiring “Paid Review” disclosures.  It seems that if Google wants to discount paid posts, they are going to have to look for the terms “Paid Review” or “Sponsored Post” or a PayPerPost badge.

So how can Google detect paid links using an algorithm?  Here are a couple thoughts:

• Look for the keywords.  Things like “Sponsored”, “Advertisers”, “Paid Review”, “Sponsors”, etc. and discount the page rank passed by links near those terms.
• Look at the location.  Links grouped together in a list to the side of the content may increase their paid-link score. I think Google already does this with blog comments.  Links in comments seem to be weighted less than links in the actual story.
• Look at context.  Lists of links that go to sites that seem out of character.  For example, if Google knows that 50% of the personal finance blogs link to Yahoo’s online quote system, that link might not look out of character to find in the sidebar of a personal finance blog.  However a list of links that doesn’t appear on any similar sites may look out of character.
• Look at how the links change.  Links that remain static for a year may have a lower paid-link score than links that are swapped out with new links every month.

Some additional discussion here and here.

A week ago I sat down and decided to see what type of traffic is generated by having a link from John Chow.  I posted a bunch of comments and made it to the top commentator’s list where I remained for a week.  At the end of the week, I had a total of 48 visitors from JohnChow.com.  Most of them came from the main page.  47 came to my front page.  The other probably followed a deep link from the review John did of www.productivity501.com.

I was actually surprised at how low the numbers were.  With a paid review and a sitewide link in the sidebar and a link on a bunch of comments, there were only 48 clicks.  I’m curious how many unique visitors John gets in a week.  I haven’t been able to find it in any of his posts, so I’m guessing it isn’t very high.

John is doing an excellent job of marketing his blog and revealing just the information that will help him become more popular.  It will be very interesting to see if he can keep this up to the point that the blogs popularity becomes on par with the image he is projecting.

There is quite a bit to learn from watching his site and most of it isn’t showing up in the posts.

Leadership501 is a site full of articles about leadership. I created it to be a reference for people looking to improve their leadership skills.  I have found that much of the current leadership writing either focuses on being inspirational or very theoretical, so my goal is to try to create something that is practical and useful.  Something along the lines of “Here is how to handle situation X and why you should handle it that way.”

Today I ran across a blog with a post that was linking to the site with some good things to say about one of my articles.  Jason says he liked my article enough that he read the entire thing.  I’m glad he liked it because when I was writing that particular article I remember thinking, “This is pretty long.  I wonder if anyone will actually read the whole thing?”  I decided that even if no one read it I need to write it for myself.

In his post he makes some good points about setting goals and walks the reader through his goal setting process.  It is worth reading.  I like where he said that in the initial stage the only “rule” is that if he thinks it, he writes it down. Anyway it is worth a read and his blog is one I’ll be adding to my RSS feeder.