Again, NC doesn’t offer *argument* just polemic. He thinks the reasoning is self-evident, but it’s not. But he still doesn’t seem able to explain it.

If I may be so bold, in 50 years (or less), there’ll be gay marriage, and people will wonder what all the hoopla was about, just as we do today regarding interracial marriage.

I try and keep it simple for those of you who’ve been educated into imbecility. I guess I used too many two syllable words. Here, let’s try it again sport…
Homo marriage.
Fish.
Barrel.
Bang.

The above is barely coherent, as you may have realized by reading it. If intelligence like this is who the AFA et al. have on their side, then people who agree with me have nothing to worry about.

I used rationality and argument, NC3 used namecalling and incoherence. No wonder the body politic is in trouble if this is what passes for “discussion.”

The perverts as always are out in force. There’s a reason blogdex has this story at number 2 right now. My answer is so What? Homosexual marriage is a loser from the get-go. Not unlike the homo activists themselves. Ho Ho!

Update on the poll. The pro-gay side is about 20 percent above the anti-gay side, at this point. Whoo-hoo!