Comments on: american jury, to ivygate http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/2008/11/16/american-jury-to-ivygate/ Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:00:24 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Will Peters http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/2008/11/16/american-jury-to-ivygate/comment-page-1/#comment-4106 Will Peters Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:45:06 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/?p=597#comment-4106 An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people” What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language? An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation Test on a small scale, in Cyberone An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people”

What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language?

An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution

The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation

Test on a small scale, in Cyberone

]]> By: Will Peters http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/2008/11/16/american-jury-to-ivygate/comment-page-1/#comment-4105 Will Peters Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:43:13 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/?p=597#comment-4105 An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people” What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language? An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation Let's direct the effort of programmers toward law instead of letting them waiste their talents solidifying the values of for profit corporations in the net Test on a small scale, in Cyberone. An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people”

What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language?

An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution

The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation

Let’s direct the effort of programmers toward law instead of letting them waiste their talents solidifying the values of for profit corporations in the net

Test on a small scale, in Cyberone.

]]> By: Adubs http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/2008/11/16/american-jury-to-ivygate/comment-page-1/#comment-4093 Adubs Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:20:38 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/nesson/?p=597#comment-4093 I just wanted to say that from a struggling musicians standpoint your tenacity to take upon the federal courts about music sharing is bold and courageous. I wish you the best of luck and hope that this ridiculous law is stricken. What is music if it can't be shared? The ones making money out of this are not the artists, but rather lonely men that can't play guitar. I just wanted to say that from a struggling musicians standpoint your tenacity to take upon the federal courts about music sharing is bold and courageous. I wish you the best of luck and hope that this ridiculous law is stricken.

What is music if it can’t be shared? The ones making money out of this are not the artists, but rather lonely men that can’t play guitar.

]]>