Comments on: RSS 2.0 Spec Transferred, Released Under Creative Commons License http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/07/18/rss-20-spec-transferred-released-under-creative-commons-license/ From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Zzzzz http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/07/18/rss-20-spec-transferred-released-under-creative-commons-license/comment-page-1/#comment-304 Zzzzz Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:48:01 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/07/18/rss-20-spec-transferred-released-unde#comment-304 <a></a> That it's published at all should be considered progress. Years of trying to get Dave to run his "public" specs through a more traditional RFC process has fallen on deaf ears, mostly because of (perceived) control issues.

That it’s published at all should be considered progress. Years of trying to get Dave to run his “public” specs through a more traditional RFC process has fallen on deaf ears, mostly because of (perceived) control issues.

]]> By: no http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/07/18/rss-20-spec-transferred-released-under-creative-commons-license/comment-page-1/#comment-303 no Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:43:00 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/07/18/rss-20-spec-transferred-released-unde#comment-303 <a></a> Publishing RSS 2 within the W3C would have been nicer.. But heck, Dave doesn't like the W3C. :)

Publishing RSS 2 within the W3C would have been nicer.. But heck, Dave doesn’t like the W3C. :)

]]>