Comments on: Intellectual Property Day at the Oxford Internet Institute http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxford-internet-institute/ From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxford-internet-institute/comment-page-1/#comment-328 Seth Finkelstein Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:38:03 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxfo#comment-328 <a></a> Much more rebuttal: <a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000371.html">Peter Davies, Felten, DMCA liability</a> <a href="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000422.html">Ed Felten - Revisionism</a> <a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000374.html">Peter Davies rebutted on DMCA liability by Ed Felten</a> <a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000375.html">Peter Davies, DMCA, and public domain</a>

Much more rebuttal:

Peter Davies, Felten, DMCA liability

Ed Felten – Revisionism

Peter Davies rebutted on DMCA liability by Ed Felten

Peter Davies, DMCA, and public domain

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxford-internet-institute/comment-page-1/#comment-308 Seth Finkelstein Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:23:04 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxfo#comment-308 <a></a> ACK, wrong link - this is the right one: <a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000187.html">"chicken little" argument</a>

ACK, wrong link – this is the right one: “chicken little” argument

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxford-internet-institute/comment-page-1/#comment-307 Seth Finkelstein Fri, 01 Aug 2003 18:20:59 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxfo#comment-307 <a></a> See my old blog entry on the <a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000186.html">"chicken little" argument</a> <blockquote> I have a standard offer for lawyers who write things such as the "chicken littles" paragraph above. I say: Since, according to you, there is no risk, well then, there should be no problem at all for you to agree to represent me <em>pro bono</em> for any relevant charges arising from my censorware work. No risk, right? So there's no risk in your making such agreement, right? Here's how you can show you believe it yourself, when there's a risk to you! I have yet to find a lawyer, who makes derisive comments like that quoted remark, who will then take me up on that offer. ... </blockquote>

See my old blog entry on the “chicken little” argument

I have a standard offer for lawyers who write things such as the
“chicken littles” paragraph above. I say: Since, according to you,
there is no risk, well then, there should be no problem at all for you
to agree to represent me pro bono for any relevant charges arising
from my censorware work. No risk, right? So there’s no risk in your
making such agreement, right? Here’s how you can show you believe it
yourself, when there’s a risk to you!

I have yet to find a lawyer, who makes derisive comments like that
quoted remark, who will then take me up on that offer. …

]]> By: Richard Hodkinson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxford-internet-institute/comment-page-1/#comment-306 Richard Hodkinson Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:55:42 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/01/intellectual-property-day-at-the-oxfo#comment-306 <a></a> 1000 thanks to John whose exposition and facilitation in this marvellously interactive seminar was outstanding. Not only that, he helped us frame and order our thoughts on the possible directions digital music rights could go in the future. I'm posting a report form our end on my spanking new blog at http://blog.richardhod.com

1000 thanks to John whose exposition and facilitation in this marvellously interactive seminar was outstanding. Not only that, he helped us frame and order our thoughts on the possible directions digital music rights could go in the future.
I’m posting a report form our end on my spanking new blog at http://blog.richardhod.com

]]>