Comments on: News.com on blogs battle http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/ From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Bob http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-32777 Bob Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:25:55 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-32777 Phentermine, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/dbworld/messages/2007-10/1192719580.html Phentermine, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/dbworld/messages/2007-10/1192719580.html

]]> By: Portland Hotels http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-181 Portland Hotels Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:28:37 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-181 <a></a> Beijing Hotels

Beijing Hotels

]]> By: Nice Hotels http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Nice Hotels Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:12:28 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-179 <a></a> Charlotte Hotels

Charlotte Hotels

]]> By: Donny http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-162 Donny Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:07:49 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-162 <a></a> Thank you for the info!

Thank you for the info!

]]> By: Renaissance Costume http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-147 Renaissance Costume Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:35:23 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-147 <a></a> Costume Pattern

Costume Pattern

]]> By: Cartoon Cat http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-146 Cartoon Cat Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:35:48 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-146 <a></a> Cartoon Comic

Cartoon Comic

]]> By: Gergana http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-132 Gergana Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:42:12 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-132 <a></a> Your blog is very interesint

Your blog is very interesint

]]> By: John Palfrey http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-337 John Palfrey Tue, 19 Aug 2003 03:05:54 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-337 <a></a> Dear Ken MacLeod: Back from travels, and noting your queries and your e-mail to me on a similar topic: the essential point of what's happened is that *anyone* can change the RSS spec, so long as they do so consistent with the (cc) license to which it's subject. Neither the Berkman Center nor anyone else would be in a position to stop that person. Whether others follow the fork or not is up to them. Whether people follow the advice of the Advisory Board or not is up to them. The spec is free, subject to very modest restrictions (attribution, share-alike), and so is the Advisory Board's advice. -JP

Dear Ken MacLeod:

Back from travels, and noting your queries and your e-mail to me on a similar topic: the essential point of what’s happened is that *anyone* can change the RSS spec, so long as they do so consistent with the (cc) license to which it’s subject. Neither the Berkman Center nor anyone else would be in a position to stop that person. Whether others follow the fork or not is up to them. Whether people follow the advice of the Advisory Board or not is up to them. The spec is free, subject to very modest restrictions (attribution, share-alike), and so is the Advisory Board’s advice.

-JP

]]> By: Ken MacLeod http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-330 Ken MacLeod Fri, 08 Aug 2003 04:23:15 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-330 <a></a> Continuing to try to address the issues as directly as possible, I've created an "RSS political counterpoint" at <a href="http://bitsko.slc.ut.us/2003/08/ken-rss-faq.html">Ken MacLeod's RSS Political FAQ</a>.

Continuing to try to address the issues as directly as possible, I’ve created an “RSS political counterpoint” at Ken MacLeod’s RSS Political FAQ.

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-327 Seth Finkelstein Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:30:20 +0000 http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2003/08/04/newscom-on-blogs-battle/#comment-327 <a></a> Dave: As best I can articulate, since I've been trying to understand what the RSS wars are <em>about</em>, it's an Emacs vs. Vi style vision difference. That is, do you have something small and compact and bullet-proof for what it does, or something that places a premium on extensibility, even at a cost of complexity. That is what I see as driving the dispute. The "personality" issues are overall reflecting strong beliefs in the competing visions.

Dave: As best I can articulate, since I’ve been trying to understand what the RSS wars are about, it’s
an Emacs vs. Vi style vision difference. That is, do you have something small and compact and bullet-proof for
what it does, or something that places a premium on extensibility, even at a cost of complexity.

That is what I see as driving the dispute. The “personality” issues are overall reflecting
strong beliefs in the competing visions.

]]>