<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pornographer sues Google on 12 grounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-grounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-grounds/</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mabus Foo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-grounds/comment-page-1/#comment-20681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mabus Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-ground#comment-20681</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a plan. Maybe I can sue for something too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a plan. Maybe I can sue for something too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AngryEttta</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-grounds/comment-page-1/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>AngryEttta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-ground#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s reaaly great thing! You only think a some - you can get everything only by clicking pictures - all thet is inet! And i&#039;m glad that your site is part of this massive all the world network!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s reaaly great thing! You only think a some &#8211; you can get everything only by clicking pictures &#8211; all thet is inet! And i&#8217;m glad that your site is part of this massive all the world network!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making a Market Emerge out of Digital Copyright Uncertainty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-grounds/comment-page-1/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making a Market Emerge out of Digital Copyright Uncertainty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clem.law.harvard.edu/jpalfrey/2004/11/20/pornographer-sues-google-on-12-ground#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>[...] My view (in large measure reflected in the WSJ here, in a discussion with Prof. Stan Liebowitz) is that Google is taking on some, but not all that much, copyright risk in its acquisition of YouTube. Google has already proven its mettle in terms of offering services that bring with them a reasonably high appetite for copyright risk: witness the lawsuits filed by the likes of the publishing industry at large; the pornographer Perfect 10; and Agence France Presse. There&#8217;s no doubt that Google will have to respond to challenges on both secondary copyright liability and direct copyright liability as a result of this acquisition. If they are diligent and follow the advice of their (truly) brilliant legal team, I think Google should be able to withstand these challenges as a matter of law. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My view (in large measure reflected in the WSJ here, in a discussion with Prof. Stan Liebowitz) is that Google is taking on some, but not all that much, copyright risk in its acquisition of YouTube. Google has already proven its mettle in terms of offering services that bring with them a reasonably high appetite for copyright risk: witness the lawsuits filed by the likes of the publishing industry at large; the pornographer Perfect 10; and Agence France Presse. There&#8217;s no doubt that Google will have to respond to challenges on both secondary copyright liability and direct copyright liability as a result of this acquisition. If they are diligent and follow the advice of their (truly) brilliant legal team, I think Google should be able to withstand these challenges as a matter of law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
