http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/07/27/jump-in-on-the-generative-internet-debate/ From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/07/27/jump-in-on-the-generative-internet-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1846 Jonathan Zittrain Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:39:08 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/07/27/jump-in-on-the-generative-internet-de#comment-1846 I'm just finishing up a FAQ based on all the comments -- PJ has said she will post tomorrow morning. Sorry for the delay; it's largely because the comments were so plentiful and considerate. ...JZ I’m just finishing up a FAQ based on all the comments — PJ has said she will post tomorrow morning. Sorry for the delay; it’s largely because the comments were so plentiful and considerate. …JZ

]]> http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/07/27/jump-in-on-the-generative-internet-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1845 Groklaw Reader Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:23:49 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/07/27/jump-in-on-the-generative-internet-de#comment-1845 I find it disingenuous that JZ committed to engaging in a dialogue with the Groklaw readership, but has not posted a single item of substance. Other Groklaw readers noticed this as well - see the several posts that refer to the "chirping crickets." After such plentiful and considerate feedback, at least an acknowledgement or a simple "thank you" would be more than appropriate. I find it disingenuous that JZ committed to engaging in a dialogue with the Groklaw readership, but has not posted a single item of substance. Other Groklaw readers noticed this as well – see the several posts that refer to the “chirping crickets.” After such plentiful and considerate feedback, at least an acknowledgement or a simple “thank you” would be more than appropriate.

]]>