<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Election Day, and Come Blog the Vote at Berkman with BMG and others!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mmhnnbdw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/comment-page-1/#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>mmhnnbdw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;mmhnnbdw...&lt;/strong&gt;

mmhnnbdw...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>mmhnnbdw&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>mmhnnbdw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffiyvdnh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>ffiyvdnh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ffiyvdnh...&lt;/strong&gt;

ffiyvdnh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ffiyvdnh&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ffiyvdnh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zegplrpp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/comment-page-1/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>zegplrpp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 06:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;zegplrpp...&lt;/strong&gt;

zegplrpp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>zegplrpp&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>zegplrpp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Day After: Got Democracy?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Day After: Got Democracy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>[...] John Bracken replies to my question of yesterday about the changing (?) nature of politics in the era of the Internet(s): &#8220;Two years later, is there evidence that we are more energized, are there signs of semiotic democracy? Certainly, the war, Katrina and corruption scandals may have energized liberal voters, but I don’t attribute much of that energy to the internet. I suspect that the election news junkies among us would be just as junkified, with or without the Internets. I am reminded by frequent exhortations by a non-blogging, a labor organizer friend that shoe leather on-the-ground is more important than bloggers and bits. I’ve argued this over with him several times, but some of tonight’s results may bear him out. (As of this writing, certain bloggers are notably quiet on Lamont’s apparent loss– or saying such claims are merely an “MSM” thing.) But what does the research bear out? Yes, we can use information ourselves when we can access it and there are some cool tools for covering the poltical process and actual voting. But has our ability to maintain &#8216;a more active relationship with information&#8217; changed the way our governments do their work and deliver services? Not yet, not from where I sit.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Bracken replies to my question of yesterday about the changing (?) nature of politics in the era of the Internet(s): &#8220;Two years later, is there evidence that we are more energized, are there signs of semiotic democracy? Certainly, the war, Katrina and corruption scandals may have energized liberal voters, but I don’t attribute much of that energy to the internet. I suspect that the election news junkies among us would be just as junkified, with or without the Internets. I am reminded by frequent exhortations by a non-blogging, a labor organizer friend that shoe leather on-the-ground is more important than bloggers and bits. I’ve argued this over with him several times, but some of tonight’s results may bear him out. (As of this writing, certain bloggers are notably quiet on Lamont’s apparent loss– or saying such claims are merely an “MSM” thing.) But what does the research bear out? Yes, we can use information ourselves when we can access it and there are some cool tools for covering the poltical process and actual voting. But has our ability to maintain &#8216;a more active relationship with information&#8217; changed the way our governments do their work and deliver services? Not yet, not from where I sit.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeking Semiotic Democracy on Election Night &#171; Media SITREP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-vote-at-berkman-with-bmg-and-o/comment-page-1/#comment-2410</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeking Semiotic Democracy on Election Night &#171; Media SITREP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/11/07/happy-election-day-and-come-blog-the-#comment-2410</guid>
		<description>[...] Unfortunately I couldn&#8217;t make it to the Berkman Center&#8217;s Blogger Bash today, but like many others, I&#8217;m wiling away the hours before the Midterm Midtacular by checking in on CNN and blogs while keeping an ear to NPR (and Chicago Public Radio) for election news and finishing up some left over Halloween candy. (I&#8217;m a bit sad that my look-alike couldn&#8217;t pull off a victory.) I also caught this thoughtful question tossed out by John Palfrey: There’s no doubt that more people are getting involved in politics through Internet activism than in previous cycles. The outstanding question, it seems to me, is whether or not Internet is making a difference in the political process. I’m inclined to say it is. And seeing those who are live-blogging the election here makes that case pretty clearly to me, anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately I couldn&#8217;t make it to the Berkman Center&#8217;s Blogger Bash today, but like many others, I&#8217;m wiling away the hours before the Midterm Midtacular by checking in on CNN and blogs while keeping an ear to NPR (and Chicago Public Radio) for election news and finishing up some left over Halloween candy. (I&#8217;m a bit sad that my look-alike couldn&#8217;t pull off a victory.) I also caught this thoughtful question tossed out by John Palfrey: There’s no doubt that more people are getting involved in politics through Internet activism than in previous cycles. The outstanding question, it seems to me, is whether or not Internet is making a difference in the political process. I’m inclined to say it is. And seeing those who are live-blogging the election here makes that case pretty clearly to me, anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
