<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the &#8220;Day 2&#8243; Story on the Viacom-YouTube Tussle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Information Law Possum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DMCA § 512 action as a compliance risk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Law Possum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DMCA § 512 action as a compliance risk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-5083</guid>
		<description>[...] This is--to take up the title of a post by Professor John Palfrey--day 4 of the Viacom-Youtube saga. Viacom has retracted its copyright claim regarding Jim Moore&#8217;s home video. Three things will remain: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is&#8211;to take up the title of a post by Professor John Palfrey&#8211;day 4 of the Viacom-Youtube saga. Viacom has retracted its copyright claim regarding Jim Moore&#8217;s home video. Three things will remain: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Copyfighter&#8217;s Musings &#187; How Many Mistaken Takedowns Did Viacom Send?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>A Copyfighter&#8217;s Musings &#187; How Many Mistaken Takedowns Did Viacom Send?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>[...] JP has everything you need to know to get caught up on Viacom&#8217;s C&amp;D&#8217;s to YouTube. TopTenSources is aggregating stories about takedown misfires, whether outright errors or overreaching copyright claims. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JP has everything you need to know to get caught up on Viacom&#8217;s C&amp;D&#8217;s to YouTube. TopTenSources is aggregating stories about takedown misfires, whether outright errors or overreaching copyright claims. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim moore</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-4995</link>
		<dc:creator>jim moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-4995</guid>
		<description>I think a day two research topic would be to look at the slant of the mainstream news stories versus the blogs...mainstream seems pro Viacom, blogs seem pro free culture and YouTube and Google.  Not surprising, but stunning.  Quantitative study would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a day two research topic would be to look at the slant of the mainstream news stories versus the blogs&#8230;mainstream seems pro Viacom, blogs seem pro free culture and YouTube and Google.  Not surprising, but stunning.  Quantitative study would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penxv</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>penxv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>Revver.com and dailymotion.com are two viral video websites that can potentially compete.  Revver.com has already started paying ad dollars for original content, so that is probably what is going to push Youtube to do the same.

I bet Viacom is going to start hosting their content themselves.  Otherwise why bother taking stuff down off of youtube (it probably helps them more than it hurts them).

Taking my videos down was definitely a misfire, but it isn&#039;t particularly damaging.  I was going to switch to revver anyway.  Now it&#039;s just sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nbsp;<a href="http://Revver.com" title="http://Revver. " target="_blank">Revver.com</a> and&nbsp;<a href="http://dailymotion.com" title="http://dailymotion. " target="_blank">dailymotion.com</a> are two viral video websites that can potentially compete. &nbsp;<a href="http://Revver.com" title="http://Revver. " target="_blank">Revver.com</a> has already started paying ad dollars for original content, so that is probably what is going to push Youtube to do the same.</p>
<p>I bet Viacom is going to start hosting their content themselves.  Otherwise why bother taking stuff down off of youtube (it probably helps them more than it hurts them).</p>
<p>Taking my videos down was definitely a misfire, but it isn&#8217;t particularly damaging.  I was going to switch to revver anyway.  Now it&#8217;s just sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palfrey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>palfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Clare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Clare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Dedlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-4950</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Dedlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-4950</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Viacom and CBS officially split up in 2006, I just got the memo.

So the plot thickens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Viacom and CBS officially split up in 2006, I just got the memo.</p>
<p>So the plot thickens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Dedlock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-youtube-tussle/comment-page-1/#comment-4949</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Dedlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/03/whats-the-day-2-story-on-the-viacom-y#comment-4949</guid>
		<description>CBS is owned by Viacom, so... Viacom has already done that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS is owned by Viacom, so&#8230; Viacom has already done that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
