<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Believes Fewer Than 60 Take-Down Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knee problems caused by prednisone.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-100273</link>
		<dc:creator>Knee problems caused by prednisone.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-100273</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Apo prednisone and cats....&lt;/strong&gt;

Prednisone. Side effects of prednisone. Prednisone side effects....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Apo prednisone and cats&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Prednisone. Side effects of prednisone. Prednisone side effects&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The plot thickens&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-74837</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The plot thickens&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-74837</guid>
		<description>[...] karaoke in Singapore. None of these contained anything owned by Viacom. For its part, Viacom has admitted to &#8220;no more than&#8221; 60 mistakes, so far. Yet each mistake impacts free speech, both of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] karaoke in Singapore. None of these contained anything owned by Viacom. For its part, Viacom has admitted to &#8220;no more than&#8221; 60 mistakes, so far. Yet each mistake impacts free speech, both of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The plot thickens&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-74838</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The plot thickens&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-74838</guid>
		<description>[...] karaoke in Singapore. None of these contained anything owned by Viacom. For its part, Viacom has admitted to &#8220;no more than&#8221; 60 mistakes, so far. Yet each mistake impacts free speech, both of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] karaoke in Singapore. None of these contained anything owned by Viacom. For its part, Viacom has admitted to &#8220;no more than&#8221; 60 mistakes, so far. Yet each mistake impacts free speech, both of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-57803</link>
		<dc:creator>Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-57803</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;  &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristotelis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-27568</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-27568</guid>
		<description>Cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-25195</link>
		<dc:creator>Markos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-25195</guid>
		<description>Sorry :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-21838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 23:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-21838</guid>
		<description>viacom took over neopets and made it suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viacom took over neopets and made it suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; YouTube: Are YouTubers at risk? EFF says so &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-20574</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; YouTube: Are YouTubers at risk? EFF says so &#124; Digital Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-20574</guid>
		<description>[...] In a series of posts at his blog since last Friday, Palfrey has sought to answer what he considers a pivotal question: How many Jim Moores are out there? I wonder how many home videos have to have been caught up &#8212; and taken down &#8212; in this sweep before one could say that it was &#8220;knowing&#8221; on the part of Viacom? Combine that with the mash-ups that may include some of Viacom&#8217;s material, but where a fair use analysis will vindicate the alleged infringer. Could a human being have looked at each of these 100,000 videos? Might a court say: &#8220;You ought to have known that if you crank these notices out automatically and not checking each one, you must know there&#8217;s some non-infringing material in there&#8221;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a series of posts at his blog since last Friday, Palfrey has sought to answer what he considers a pivotal question: How many Jim Moores are out there? I wonder how many home videos have to have been caught up &mdash; and taken down &mdash; in this sweep before one could say that it was &ldquo;knowing&rdquo; on the part of Viacom? Combine that with the mash-ups that may include some of Viacom&rsquo;s material, but where a fair use analysis will vindicate the alleged infringer. Could a human being have looked at each of these 100,000 videos? Might a court say: &ldquo;You ought to have known that if you crank these notices out automatically and not checking each one, you must know there&rsquo;s some non-infringing material in there&rdquo;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Carmel-Veilleux</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-17796</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Carmel-Veilleux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-17796</guid>
		<description>@BobPaul:

They are TrackBack from blogs referencing this blog post. Many blog software segregate these from comments somehow, but it doesn&#039;t looks like this blog does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BobPaul:</p>
<p>They are TrackBack from blogs referencing this blog post. Many blog software segregate these from comments somehow, but it doesn&#8217;t looks like this blog does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobPaul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-down-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-17794</link>
		<dc:creator>BobPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/02/04/viacom-believes-fewer-than-60-take-do#comment-17794</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up with comments 3,4,5,9,10,11, and 12? They&#039;re obviously spam, but to what purpose? It&#039;s like someone&#039;s posting a summary of this blog to this blog. Huh??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up with comments 3,4,5,9,10,11, and 12? They&#8217;re obviously spam, but to what purpose? It&#8217;s like someone&#8217;s posting a summary of this blog to this blog. Huh??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
