Comments on: Ira Rubinstein on Microsoft’s Corporate Privacy Guidelines http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/03/09/1131/ From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Ron Pecktrol http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/03/09/1131/comment-page-1/#comment-20473 Ron Pecktrol Sun, 20 May 2007 19:09:10 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/03/09/1131/#comment-20473 Is “no thanks” a choice they should offer, even if that’s a very poor choice for a user to make? Yes, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">they</a> MUST offer a NO THANKS option. Is “no thanks” a choice they should offer, even if that’s a very poor choice for a user to make?

Yes, they MUST offer a NO THANKS option.

]]> By: Benlog » Microsoft’s Competitive Advantage: Privacy http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/03/09/1131/comment-page-1/#comment-17004 Benlog » Microsoft’s Competitive Advantage: Privacy Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:06:52 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/03/09/1131/#comment-17004 [...] Today, I attended a lunch at the Berkman Center with Microsoft’s Ira Rubinstein. Ira talked about privacy and how it is built into the Microsoft development model. He mentioned Microsoft’s new layered approach to privacy policies, where a simple front page gives you the highlights, and you can drill down on any point. A bit like the Creative Commons deeds, without the nice icons (maybe there should be privacy concept icons?) [...] [...] Today, I attended a lunch at the Berkman Center with Microsoft’s Ira Rubinstein. Ira talked about privacy and how it is built into the Microsoft development model. He mentioned Microsoft’s new layered approach to privacy policies, where a simple front page gives you the highlights, and you can drill down on any point. A bit like the Creative Commons deeds, without the nice icons (maybe there should be privacy concept icons?) [...]

]]>