<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET Touches on Blogs and Copyright Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:34:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amateur.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-100791</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-i#comment-100791</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Amateur....&lt;/strong&gt;

Amateur....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amateur&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Amateur&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-23296</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-i#comment-23296</guid>
		<description>Anand is perfectly right.
digg, del.icio.us, reddit and all such sites do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anand is perfectly right.<br />
digg,&nbsp;<a href="http://del.icio.us" title="http://del.icio. " target="_blank">del.icio.us</a>, reddit and all such sites do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Social networks: what goes out, what goes in &#124; Lawgarithms &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-23014</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Social networks: what goes out, what goes in &#124; Lawgarithms &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-i#comment-23014</guid>
		<description>[...] I have long thought Creative Commons moves us significantly closer to this third estate media ecosystem, but doesn&#8217;t quite take us all the way there. John Palfrey points this out in his post today on blog scraping and the ongoing licensing/compensation gap. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have long thought Creative Commons moves us significantly closer to this third estate media ecosystem, but doesn&#8217;t quite take us all the way there. John Palfrey points this out in his post today on blog scraping and the ongoing licensing/compensation gap. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-23009</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/08/02/cnet-touches-on-blogs-and-copyright-i#comment-23009</guid>
		<description>Agreed that there are quite a few sites that do so with the malicious intent of using the text to serve contextual ads. But, simply finding fault with all the aggregators (even those who only serve headings and link attributions) is going overboard. 

In that sense, Techmeme should not exist. Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit..none of those should exist. Since, they all have nothing but links to other sites and nothing of their own. 

I guess people like VanFossen (in the News.com article) would learn the real value of such sites only when all of them cease to exist and people get back to pre web 2.0 age and have hardly noone visiting their pages..

------------------
Anand
Feedrer (Private beta)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that there are quite a few sites that do so with the malicious intent of using the text to serve contextual ads. But, simply finding fault with all the aggregators (even those who only serve headings and link attributions) is going overboard. </p>
<p>In that sense, Techmeme should not exist. Digg,&nbsp;<a href="http://Del.icio.us" title="http://Del.icio. " target="_blank">Del.icio.us</a>, Reddit..none of those should exist. Since, they all have nothing but links to other sites and nothing of their own. </p>
<p>I guess people like VanFossen (in the&nbsp;<a href="http://News.com" title="http://News. " target="_blank">News.com</a> article) would learn the real value of such sites only when all of them cease to exist and people get back to pre web 2.0 age and have hardly noone visiting their pages..</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Anand<br />
Feedrer (Private beta)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
