<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>John Palfrey &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/category/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey</link>
	<description>From the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Spam Such a Hard Problem, Still?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/09/23/why-is-spam-such-a-hard-problem-still/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/09/23/why-is-spam-such-a-hard-problem-still/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>palfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[StyleFeeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/09/23/why-is-spam-such-a-hard-problem-still</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Savage, (VP of technology at StyleFeeder), has a great, clear, simple post on Russian spam.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Savage, (VP of technology at <a href="http://www.stylefeeder.com">StyleFeeder</a>), has a great, clear, simple <a href="http://www.efsavage.com/blog/posts/russian_spam_gmail/">post</a> on Russian spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2007/09/23/why-is-spam-such-a-hard-problem-still/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian spam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/09/13/australian-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/09/13/australian-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>palfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/09/13/australian-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia is often heralded as having one of the world&#8217;s best anti-spam laws and enforcement programs.  Sounds like they may also be home to one of the world&#8217;s biggest spammers, accused of sending over 2 billion spam messages.  Alone.  In a single year.  All about Viagra (or, V#%GR@).  I&#8217;m sure I got about 50,000 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia is often heralded as having one of the world&#8217;s best anti-spam laws and enforcement programs.  Sounds like they may also be <a href="http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2006/09/13/360389-man-may-have-sent-2-billion-spam-e-mails">home to one of the world&#8217;s biggest spammers</a>, accused of sending over 2 billion spam messages.  Alone.  In a single year.  All about Viagra (or, V#%GR@).  I&#8217;m sure I got about 50,000 of those 2 billion.  And using what appears to be a not very sophisticated system.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2006/09/13/australian-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
