<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Occasional Pamphlet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet</link>
	<description>on scholarly communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:50:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; rights retention for scholarly articles by Psychic Guy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/06/18/dont-ask-dont-tell-rights-retention-for-scholarly-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychic Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=159#comment-415</guid>
		<description>If publishers aren&#039;t protecting their rights, big whoop! For years publishers have generated huge profits at the expense of authors. It&#039;s nice to see the tables turning, thanks to the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If publishers aren&#8217;t protecting their rights, big whoop! For years publishers have generated huge profits at the expense of authors. It&#8217;s nice to see the tables turning, thanks to the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Stuart Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Apologies. My post (no. 8) is misleading. 

I most certainly DO agree with Shieber&#039;s overall conclusion that author-pays OA is not vanity publishing. I just think his reasoning and some of his assertions are flawed. For example the notion that raising author charges requires a lowering of standards. This is palpably false (check out Cell Press, for example!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies. My post (no. 8) is misleading. </p>
<p>I most certainly DO agree with Shieber&#8217;s overall conclusion that author-pays OA is not vanity publishing. I just think his reasoning and some of his assertions are flawed. For example the notion that raising author charges requires a lowering of standards. This is palpably false (check out Cell Press, for example!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Stuart Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Philip Davis has now written a raher more considered analysis which refutes this article&#039;s main claim  http://6.gp/e8h</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Davis has now written a raher more considered analysis which refutes this article&#8217;s main claim  <a href="http://6.gp/e8h" rel="nofollow">http://6.gp/e8h</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Open Access and Vanity Publishing &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Access and Vanity Publishing &#171; The Scholarly Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-285</guid>
		<description>[...] week on his blog &#8220;The Occasional Pamphlet,&#8221; Stuart Shieber attempted to answer this question empirically.  In his post, Shieber plots [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week on his blog &#8220;The Occasional Pamphlet,&#8221; Stuart Shieber attempted to answer this question empirically.  In his post, Shieber plots [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Tweetlinks, 10-20-09 [A Blog Around The Clock] &#171; Technology Blogs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetlinks, 10-20-09 [A Blog Around The Clock] &#171; Technology Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-283</guid>
		<description>[...] Shieber: Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? &#8211; &#8216;Not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shieber: Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? &#8211; &#8216;Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Recent links on Open Access &#171; Free Our Books</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent links on Open Access &#171; Free Our Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-279</guid>
		<description>[...] Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry?: &#8216;From an empirical point of view, current open-access journals display a pricing structure that does not indicate a vanity press industry, as we demonstrate below in a new analysis of OA publication fee data.&#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry?: &#8216;From an empirical point of view, current open-access journals display a pricing structure that does not indicate a vanity press industry, as we demonstrate below in a new analysis of OA publication fee data.&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Stuart Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-277</guid>
		<description>There are a number of non-sequiturs in this article. For example, that raising the publication charge requires a lowering of standards. The article essentially sets up the &quot;straw man&quot; that OA = vanity publishing only to then demolish it. Not very surprising really!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of non-sequiturs in this article. For example, that raising the publication charge requires a lowering of standards. The article essentially sets up the &#8220;straw man&#8221; that OA = vanity publishing only to then demolish it. Not very surprising really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Links 17/10/2009: Parsix GNU/Linux 3.0 Released; Mandriva Summons Community &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 17/10/2009: Parsix GNU/Linux 3.0 Released; Mandriva Summons Community &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-275</guid>
		<description>[...] Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? Vanity journal domination is not occurring, nor is it likely to occur, among OA journals. Vanity journal existence will and does happen among both OA and subscription-fee journals, but at least for OA journals is a benign phenomenon. As subscription-fee journals more and more charge author-side fees, including hybrid open-access fees, one can only hope that the baseless vanity press recrimination against open-access journals will fade away. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? Vanity journal domination is not occurring, nor is it likely to occur, among OA journals. Vanity journal existence will and does happen among both OA and subscription-fee journals, but at least for OA journals is a benign phenomenon. As subscription-fee journals more and more charge author-side fees, including hybrid open-access fees, one can only hope that the baseless vanity press recrimination against open-access journals will fade away. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Saturday, 17-Oct-09 22:16:19 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Saturday, 17-Oct-09 22:16:19 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is open-access journal publishing a vanity publishing industry? by Glyn Moody (glynmoody) 's status on Friday, 16-Oct-09 09:20:19 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Glyn Moody (glynmoody) 's status on Friday, 16-Oct-09 09:20:19 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/?p=327#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu...       a few seconds ago  from  Gwibber [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/pamphlet/2009/10/16/is-open-access-publishing-a-vanity-publishing-indu..</a>.       a few seconds ago  from  Gwibber [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
