Good afternoon, readers!

To let you know: Academic Search Premier has a new search interface.  The new look is much cleaner and less confusing than the version about which I described last summer.   The content of the search interface remains largely the same, with the addition of being able to search for cited references.

Please take a look at this new interface and let me know what you think of it.  Academic Search Premier is one of my favorite databases to use when doing philosophical research, and I’m hoping that the new interface will encourage others to use it more often.

Good afternoon, all!

This morning, I was asked a question about accessing Philosophy Compass, formerly published by Blackwell, but now part of Wiley-Interscience.

If you are at Harvard, all you will need is your PIN and ID to access the Philosophy Compass.  If you search “philosophy compass” in HOLLIS, setting the search parameters to “title,” you’ll turn up the record, which lists the URL for the database.

However, you will not be able to access the articles at the present time.  As former Blackwell content, the Philosophy Compass is part of the migration of that content over to the Wiley-Interscience platform that began about two weeks ago.  Unfortunately, the migration of the content did not go as smoothly as planned, and there are a number of items that are currently unavailable, the Philosophy Compass being one of them.

I do not know when this will be available again.  Wiley is moving as quickly as possible to migrate the content and make it available — no small feat when over 1.6 million articles are involved.  I will keep checking back to see if the Philosophy Compass is available, and will let you know.  I will also let you know about some of the features of the new platform.

Please don’t hesitate to let me know if you have any questions about this.

Update 14 July 2008: Access to Philosophy Compass has been restored.  You are now able to download articles without being charged.

Good afternoon, readers!

As announced last week, the database, Synergy, will no longer be available after tomorrow, 27 June 2008.  All content will be moved over to Wiley Interscience, and will be again available on 1 July 2008. You should be able to access the electronic versions of the relevant journals via HOLLIS then.

Please plan your research accordingly!

Last year, I wrote a post about the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), along with one about the Philosophy Research Network. These are great places to find current research, papers, and works-in-progress in a variety of fields, including philosophy, and I have found these sites to be very useful.

Readers who are curious about the SSRN might find this article by Noam Cohen from the New York Times about the SSRN to be of interest. Here is the introduction:

FIRST came the Amazon book rankings, and word leaked out that perhaps some vaunted writers spent more time than you would think checking how popular they were, hour by hour. Then newspapers started tracking the most popular articles on their sites and journalists, it was said, spent more time than you would think watching their rankings, hour by hour.

But would you believe that academics could become caught up in such petty, vain competition? Of course, you say. Still, short of hanging out in the stacks at the library and peeking over shoulders, the pursuit of that particular vanity had to wait for the Internet, and the creation of the Social Science Research Network, an increasingly influential site that now offers nearly 150,000 full-text documents for downloading.

Not surprisingly, there are some big questions raised by the SSRN about quality control and the worth of the materials posted therein:

The research network raises the same big questions about what is lost and what is gained by removing the barriers to being heard in the public square. Is music distributed on MySpace, without benefit of a record label’s guiding hand, better or worse? Is journalism helped by the wide reach of bloggers, or hurt as professionalism disappears? Is it good that research that has not been reviewed by peers can be found so easily and looks just the same as gold-star approved work?

Do readers have an opinion on this subject? What do they think of the quality of the materials on the SSRN?
A hat-tip to Bookforum.com for this article.

Good morning, readers!I’ve just received word that Blackwell’s Synergy database will no longer be available after 30 June 2008:

As part of the merger of Blackwell Publishing with John Wiley and Sons, we will combine all Wiley-Blackwell’s online products onto a single online platform.  From the Wiley-Blackwell site:

As a first step, we will be moving all Blackwell Synergy journal content and access rights onto Wiley InterScience as of June 30, 2008, at which point Synergy will cease to be available. As a second step, we will be launching a next-generation online service in 2009 that will include the best features of both Blackwell Synergy and Wiley InterScience and which will introduce innovative new functionality and capabilities.

From the e-mail I received this morning:

As of Monday, June 30th 2008, all Blackwell journal content—including all full-text HTML and PDF versions of articles from current issues, backfiles, and issues published online before print—will be incorporated into Wiley InterScience.

We plan to close Blackwell Synergy at the end of business (Pacific Standard Time) on Friday June 27th and we anticipate that the migration will be completed by Monday June 30th. Over the weekend of June 28th and 29th, there will be a period when both Blackwell Synergy and Wiley InterScience will be unavailable while we transition and re-index data.

We will still have access to all of the journals — the only change is that they will be on a different platform with a different interface.  Once the move has been made, I will review the new platform and write a post about it.

In the interim, please let me know if you have any questions.

Last fall, I wrote about the database, Project MUSE, which houses electronic versions of the many academic journals published by the Johns Hopkins University Press.

I received, last week, a notice from one of my library colleagues, announcing a new feature that has been recently been added to the Project MUSE records:

Project MUSE introduces linked subject headings

Users of Project MUSE articles and Tables of Contents in our recently-launched new format may have noticed an additional feature -”clickable” subject headings for each article, allowing fast and easy connections to related content in Project MUSE. Built upon the rich controlled vocabulary classification of all MUSE articles and reviews with Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) by our in-house professional cataloging staff, this new functionality quickly connects scholars to additional relevant content to enhance their research.

Linked subject headings are a powerful discovery tool for users. Following a subject heading link brings the user to an alphabetical listing of all current subject headings utilized for MUSE articles, with the selected heading as the entry point in the list. The researcher may then view additional articles that share the same subject heading, or peruse further articles with related headings. The list of subject headings is annotated with the current number of MUSE articles and reviews to which that heading is assigned.

One of the many benefits of the linked subject headings is the ability to refine a research topic when articles with a more specific focus are needed. Conversely, the linked subject headings can guide a user to articles with a broader approach when the assignment requires a more general discussion of the research topic.

MUSE has always assigned LC subject headings to articles to help users identify the topics discussed within an article and in turn, to select articles most suitable to their research. Now, by simply clicking on a subject heading, users can move from subject to subject, article to article, exploring topics and articles related to their search topic.

All MUSE articles and Tables of Contents produced since mid-April 2008 offer the new linked subject headings functionality; as older content is converted to the new format, the feature will also become available for archival articles, reviews, and Tables of Contents. Please direct any questions or comments about MUSE’s linked subject headings to Customer Support at   Full Access HTML Version | Full Access PDF Version

Library of Congress Subject Headings:

Notice the LC Subject Headings. If you click on any of the links — you will need your Harvard ID and PIN to access them — you will be taken to a list of subject headings, indicating how many articles and book reviews on that subject heading are cataloged so far in Project MUSE. So, for instance, if you are interested in more research on Kant, click on the first link, which indicates that 65 articles and 60 reviews with this subject heading can be found in this database. Scroll down the list, and you will find further refinements, with their respective listings.

This feature can be helpful, as the announcement notes, if you want to narrow or expand your research, or if you are curious to see what other research might exist on a given topic.

Any thoughts on this new feature?

Database Update: JSTOR

April 8th, 2008

Good afternoon, all!

JSTOR is a very popular database for locating older articles*, and recently, they’ve made some cosmetic changes to the interface of the database.

However, having looked over the changes, they are just that — cosmetic — JSTOR has the same search strategies and options that have been available for the last several years, so you shouldn’t have any issues in locating articles from the journals that are available on JSTOR.

* Don’t forget! There is more to the world than JSTOR! And it may indeed exist if you can’t find it on JSTOR! Ask your friendly, neighborhood librarian for more information!

Good afternoon, all! While doing some other research this afternoon, I discovered that access to and the interface of Arts & Humanities Citation Index, which I reviewed in an earlier post, has changed. Some of the features about which I wrote before have changed, and much of what I wrote in my earlier post is now obsolete.

However, this is still the same content, and it remains a great database to use. Among the changes, there are several things to note:

  • Access to the database is a bit dodgy at the moment, as the new proxy server IP address from HOLLIS to the database places the user in a doom loop. You will be unable to login, while the server keeps trying to establish a connection over and over again. The way around this is to hit the “stop loading this page” button on your browser until the database quits reloading. Then, click on the link: “If a new session is not started automatically in a few seconds, click to establish a new session” to finish the login process.  Update 2/6/2008: The access issues seem to have been resolved for now.  You should now be able to login into the database via HOLLIS without any trouble.
  • The default search screen now defaults you to searching all seven of the ISI databases to which Harvard subscribes. To access only Arts & Humanities Citation Index, click on the “Select a Database” tab, and choose “Web of Science” from the options.
  • The old command language searches (e.g., TS=philosophy of mind, AU=Dummett M) have been replaced by drop-down menus. This should eliminate some of the confusion and having to learn the command language. You still have the option of using the command language prefixes in the “Advanced Search” option.
  • The types of searches remain the same. In the “Advanced Search” option, you can limit articles by language or document type at the beginning of your search, something that cannot be done in the basic search.
  • In the default search option, you still have the option of limiting by year and by database — it is in the bottom portion of the search screen, right below the search boxes. (It’s not obvious if you aren’t looking for these limiters.)
  • In the search results screen, you can filter out by document type and subject category, though apparently not both at the same time — i.e., you can filter out by subject category, but not so as to return only articles, e.g., in that subject category.
  • You still have the option of combining several search strategies into one larger search, if you so choose.

I’m still taking some time to figuring out the quirks of this new interface, so if I have more information to report, I will do so.

Database Overview: POIESIS

December 6th, 2007

Good morning! As long promised, here is a review of the database, POIESIS.

What it is

As the Web site description notes, POIESIS is “a subscription based reference and publishing service offering searchable access to the full text of hundreds of current, recent, and back issues of a growing number of philosophy journals and series…. POIESIS now contains over 2,400 issues and 350,000 pages of text from 55 journals and series, and most of these are not available in electronic format from any other service. Put another way, the project currently contains the complete content of approximately 36,000 articles and reviews. POIESIS will ultimately contain the fulltext of 100 journals and series, and more than 70 journals have already been licensed for the project.”

Strengths

  • POIESIS contains current issues of journals like Philosophical Review, Hume Studies, Leibniz Review, and Philosophical Topics. These are journal issues to which Harvard has not previously had electronic access. Furthermore, there is access to the Table of Contents to current issues of the Journal of Philosophy, though not access to the full-text of articles.

Limitations

  • Interface: One of the big limitations to POIESIS is the interface. It is not easy to read or navigate, nor is the full-text of articles formatted in an easy-to-read or easy-to-print format. In fact, full-text articles return only the words, not the formatting, of the original article.
  • Printing: A further issue is that clicking on “print article” returns only a dark browser window with an error message. I’ve reported the problem to the database maintainers, but the matter has not been resolved as of the time of this writing. For now, to print off an article, you will have to copy and paste the text into Word or other word processing software, and clean up the formatting. Note that you may have to scroll through several pages and do this, depending on the length of the article.
  • Searching: When you use the “Power Search” (i.e., advanced search), not all of the journals to which we have access appear in the “Select title to search” box. However, if you search using the other fields, articles in these journals will appear. So, don’t worry if you don’t see the journal you want listed — search by author or title instead. I’ll discuss this more in the next section.
  • I’ve also noticed that, when searching after logging into the database, that you will occasionally reach a page where you get a message that you are no longer logged in, and cannot access the materials in question. I’m not sure why this happens. My recommendation is to document all these issues and send them to the POIESIS managers directly.

Using POIESIS

  1. Go to the HOLLIS search page, and select the “Digital Resources” tab.
  2. Set the “Search type” to “Title beginning with,” and the search terms to “poiesis.”
  3. In the results list, scroll down to “POIESIS,” and click on that link. (You can also select “POIESIS : Philosophy online serials,” which is an alternate entry.
  4. Clink on the Internet link in the record, and login with your ID and PIN.
  5. Once you’ve logged in, I strongly recommend that you read the introduction to the database. There is also a blue information icon — Poiesis help icon — on most pages, which will provide guidance if you get stuck.
  6. Searching. There are four search options:
    1. Keyword Search (default) – this is a standard keyword search, with the option to search all or one journal at a time.
    2. Power Search – this is the advanced search option. Here, you have the option to limit your search by keyword, word proximity (i.e., word x and word y within z number of each other), or journal title(s) — though not all journals are included in this list, as noted above. You also have the option of setting up a Boolean search strategy. This is helpful for searching the full-text of articles.
    3. Author/Title Search — this is an alternative advanced search option, which allows you to search by author and/or article title, and/or journal title(s), but, as with the Power Search, not all the journal titles are listed in the drop-down menu. You can set up a Boolean search with this option as well.
    4. Browse – this allows you to browse through a list of journal titles. In the left-hand frame, you should see a list of the subscribed volumes of the journal you select. Click on the “+” to the left of each volume to expand out the available issues. In the right-hand frame, the article(s) should appear. You’ll be able to navigate through the pages there.
    5. I’ve just noticed that a complete list of subscribed journals appears when you access the various search options other than Keyword Search under the heading “Subscription Journals,” which is on the left-hand side of the home page. I’m not sure why there are two different listings, but, to save yourself frustration, perhaps it’s best to access the search options from this area, rather than from the home page, so that you are not denied access for “not being logged in.”
  7. Viewing and Printing. As I noted above in the Limitations section, the formatting of articles in POIESIS is not the best. There is no option to retrieve a PDF version of an article, and printing is, for the moment, clumsy, and does not preserve the original format and layout of the article.

Summary

In spite of its clunky interface and output formatting, POIESIS is a valuable resource to use in conjunction with databases like JSTOR, Academic Search Premier, and Project MUSE. It’s the only place to obtain articles from journals like Philosophical Topics, Philosophical Review, and the like. Hopefully, in the future, a much-better interface will be designed. Until then, it will have to do.

Do you have a database that you’d like to see me review? Please drop me a line or fill out a comment and let me know.

Good morning! There’s a new online clearinghouse for the humanities that is being sponsored by the Social Sciences Research Network.

The new clearinghouse is named the Humanities Research Network (HRN), and, according to the press release, the hope is that HRN will “become a comprehensive online resource for research in humanities, providing scholars with access to current work in their field and facilitating research and scholarship.” At present, the directors of the HRN Philosophy Research Network are Lawrence Becker (Hollins University) and Brie Gertler (University of Virginia).

HRN, like the Social Sciences Research Network, posts drafts of works-in-progress, along with finished papers, all of which can be downloaded for free. Furthermore, the coverage of philosophical topics is quite broad, which should suit the interests of many in the department. (To view the expandable taxonomy of topics, please go to http://ssrn.com.ezp1.harvard.edu/browse.) Finally, there is simply a lot of great stuff on this network, as well as the Social Sciences Research Network– I’ve been poking around the site this morning, and have found several items of interest which I’m planning on looking into in the near future.

More information can be found in this press release, as well as in this article from the Chronicle of Higher Education (Harvard ID and PIN required to access it.)

I’ll also post this link in the blogroll.

Please let me know if you have any questions.