Good morning, readers!

The September 2009 book reviews from Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews are available.

The reviewed books cover Hannah Arendt, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Ernst Cassirer, David Kaplan, Rene Descartes, David Hume, Socrates, Stephen Stich, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Topics covered include aesthetics, Asian philosophy, ancient philosophy, moral & political philosophy, and time, among others.

Are any worth considering for the Robbins collection?

Good morning, readers!

For your reading pleasure this week:

The new May 2009 reviews from Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews are now available.   There’s quite a variety of philosophers and topics covered this month — Hegel, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, al-Kindi, Simplicius, Epictetus, the liar paradox, the will, aesthetics, and more.  Are any of these worth considering for the Robbins collection?

I came across this article, “The Case for Working With Your Hands,” by Matthew Crawford, several days ago, via Brian Leiter and a few friends posting it on Facebook.  It’s a very thoughtful and profound essay, on work, education, and where our culture places its priorities.

Next week, we’re back to our regular Friday posting schedule.  See you then!

Good morning, readers!

Here are the March 2009 Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

Moral & Political Philosophy

Metaphysics

Epistemology

Aesthetics

Philosophers & History of Philosophy

Philosophy of Science

Philosophy of Literature

Asian Philosophy

Philosophy of Religion

Good morning, readers!

Arrived last week: the latest issue of Philosophy & Phenomenological ResearchPhilosophy & Phenomenological Research 77(3) November 2008.

Here’s the Table of Contents:

Articles

  • The Causal Theory of Properties and the Causal Theory of Reference, or How to Name Properties and Why It Matters, Robert D. Rupert
  • Yet Another Paper on the Supervenience Argument Against Coincident Entities, Theodore Sider
  • Forgiving Someone for Who They Are (and Not Just What They’ve Done), Macalester Bell
  • Divine Hoorays: Some Parallels between Expressivism and Religious Ethics, Nicholas Unwin
  • Flattery, Yuval Eylon, David Heyd
  • Locke’s Problem Concerning Perceptual Error, Antonia Lolordo
  • Epistemic Goals and Epistemic Values, Stephen R. Grimm

Discussions

  • The Determinists Have Run Out of Luck—For a Good Reason, Storrs McCall, E.J. Lowe
  • Bad Luck Once Again, Neil Levy

Special Symposium

  • Understanding Simulation, Susan Hurley
  • Hurley on Simulation, Alvin I. Goldman

Book Symposium: Moral Skepticisms

  • Précis of Moral Skepticisms, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
  • Coping with Moral Uncertainty, Peter Railton
  • Contrastivism, Relevance Contextualism, and Meta-Skepticism, Mark Timmons
  • Do We Have Any Justified Moral Beliefs?, David Copp
  • Replies to Copp, Timmons, and Railton, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

Critical Notices

  • Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment, reviewed by Earl Conee
  • Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective, reviewed by Charles Siewert

Also arrived this week: the latest issue of NoûsNoûs 42(4) December 2008 — with an article by the department’s own Jeff McDonough:

  • New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers, Peter B.M. Vranas
  • How Expressivists Can and Should Solve Their Problem with Negation, Mark Schroeder
  • The Price of Inscrutability, J.R.G. Williams
  • Deontological Restrictions and the Self/Other Symmetry, David Alm
  • Leibniz’s Two Realms Revisited, Jeffrey K. McDonough
  • The Standard Argument for Blame Incompatibilism, Peter A. Graham
  • Problems for Testimonial Acquaintance, Michael J. Raven
  • Is the Problem of the Many a Problem in Metaphysics?, Dan López de Sa
  • On What it Takes for There to Be No Fact of the Matter, Jody Azzouni and Otávio Bueno
  • Frankfurt’s Argument against Alternative Possibilities: Looking Beyond the Exemplars, Michael McKenna

Information Philosophy

September 10th, 2008

Good morning, all!

Over the summer, I had the good fortune to meet Bob Doyle.*  Bob is a scientist, inventor, and philosopher with a keen interest in topics like free will and epistemology, among other things.  I’ve enjoyed meeting him several times now, to discuss philosophy and searching for philosophical research.

Bob recently began a fascinating blog, The I-Phi Blog, dedicated to information philosophy.  (I’ve added a link to the I-Phi Blog in the blogroll, under “Online Resources.”) Here’s the description of what the blog is all about:

I-Phi is a philosophical method grounded in science, especially modern physics, biology, neuroscience, and information theory.

It offers solutions to classical problems in philosophy, notably freedom of the will, the objective foundation of value, and the problem of knowledge (epistemology).

Insights into human freedom and cosmic values form the basis for a system of belief and a guide to moral conduct.

Additionally, Bob is also writing on these topics on the blog, The Garden of Forking Paths.

For those who study philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, free will/determinacy, and related topics, I definitely recommend reading Bob’s posts.  He is a clear and lucid writer, with an excellent grasp of the science and the philosophy involved in the discussions around these topics.  I think that you will enjoy his summaries and analyses, along with his arguments.

*In the interest of full disclosure, Bob wrote an unsolicited plug for Robbins Library Notes on the I-Phi Blog.