Good morning, readers!

Here are the March 2009 Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

Moral & Political Philosophy

Metaphysics

Epistemology

Aesthetics

Philosophers & History of Philosophy

Philosophy of Science

Philosophy of Literature

Asian Philosophy

Philosophy of Religion

Good morning, readers!

Here are the February 2009 reviews from Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:

Philosophy of Law

  • Peter Goodrich, Florian Hoffmann, Michel Rosenfeld, Cornelia Vismann (eds.), Derrida and Legal Philosophy, Reviewed by Douglas Litowitz, Magnetar Capital LLC

Moral & Political Philosophy

Philosophers and History of Philosophy

Critical Theory

Philosophy of Language

Aesthetics

Perception

Personal Identity

Philosophy of Religion

Logic

  • Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, Reviewed by Leo Groarke, Wilfrid Laurier University

Good morning, readers!

Many of you may remember an earlier post from mid-August, in which I reviewed, among other books, Michael Friedman’s A Parting of the Ways.  While browsing through Bookforum.com yesterday, I found a link to the Introduction of Edward Skidelsky’s new book, Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture.

From what I’m reading in the introduction, this book will likely have great appeal for historians of philosophy, and those interested in the development of philosophy during the late nineteenth century into the twentieth century.

What do you think, readers?  Something to acquire for Robbins?

Good morning, readers! And a happy Friday to you all!

In my travels around cyberspace last week, I discovered four great articles on philosophical practice:

A hat-tip to Bookforum.com for these links.

Good morning! A few days ago, I found this link to the introduction of Claudia Baracchi’s (New School for Social Research) new book, Aristotle’s Ethics as First Philosophy. Baracchi makes the claim that Aristotle wants to treat ethics as first philosophy.

At first glance — especially for those schooled in Continental Philosophy — “ethics as first philosophy” sounds similar to Emmanuel Levinas’ philosophy — but Baracchi insists that there is a uniquely Aristotelian way of understanding “ethics as first philosophy.”

Update: I originally included the first part of opening section, from the Cambridge University Press Web site, but have taken it down, since posting this section may be a violation of copyright.

A hat-tip to Bookforum.com for this link.