Than will be engaged today?

Hi
To write the letter, it is necessary …

Hi
Well here at you, it will be necessary still to return.

Tell, and here at you always so?

Hi
Who can answer my question?

Does anyone discussing this topic have any idea what is going on with the MIT group project GIA (Government Information Avareness)? I haven’t heard anything since the media coverage for the 4th of July and the site hasn’t progressed much from the initial launch. I am posting this here because it seems a way to reach folks who would know or more precisely care about this. I posted articles to two of my blogs today about this at http://resourcefull.antville.org
and at
http://firedup.blogspot.com

I noticed this afternoon that both sites are loading slowly, and these are stripped-down blog sites, not heavy with graphics. So it is making me go “hmmmmmm”. (Things that make you go hmmmmmmm?) Both sites have comment features so anyone can post back there if there is any knowledge out there. Thanks for considering this query.

cobalt

“Licit Jovi non licit bovi”
This is sad, indeed, but, yes. You’ve got the point.
If I’m not wrong, you mean:
USA is a rich and powerful country, and this justifies his leader for imposing his politic to other countries.

But I still believe that USA is a democratic country, and I’m not sure
this is what his population wants, especially if the people would know what means being invaded
and occupied from another country.

And of course it’s also dangerous.

I say

Nulla salus bello: pacem te poscimus omnes

but other countries could say (and some are already saying)

Si flectere nequeo superos, Acheronta moverbo

Meddix

Licit Jovi non licit bovi

“It is Democratizing Iraq”
I think this is very dangerous.
This kind of thinking is what makes USA “not so loved” in Europe.
Most of european perplexity is about the USA government, not about the people, but these words really don’t help. And I now explain myself.

A lot of “signals” suggest that the USA war against Iraq is not just for the sake of democracy, but the point is another.
Is the USA-centric point of view that is alarming. Nobody gives the USA the right to decide another country destiny, in spite of ONU decisions.

If USA begins to act out of an international consensus, what makes this country different from a so called “gangster country”? If Bush ignores international laws how can people outside USA understand who’s on the wrong side and who’s on the right one (if there is one)?

“It is Democratizing Iraq”
I think this is very dangerous.
This kind of thinking is what makes USA “not so loved” in Europe.
Most of european perplexity is about the USA government, not about the people, but these words really don’t help. And I now explain myself.

A lot of “signals” suggest that the USA war against Iraq is not just for the sake of democracy, but the point is another.
Is the USA-centric point of view that is alarming. Nobody gives the USA the right to decide another country destiny, in spite of ONU decisions.

If USA begins to act out of an international consensus, what makes this country different from a so called “gangster country”? If Bush ignores international laws how can people outside USA understand who’s on the wrong side and who’s on the right one (if there is one)?