<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Museum Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:14:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deborah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/comment-page-1/#comment-10392</link>
		<dc:creator>deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/#comment-10392</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I agree, somewhat, with this perspective. I saw the building as having a vast amount of wasted space. I tried to believe that there is a futuristic element to the design, perhaps bigger and better things are in store... 

I soon realized the archtecture is outlandish and rambles without purpose. (which is typical of and well suited to our government and its representatives) 

The exhibits are dark, small, cave-like displays which emphasize most, the miserly greed and the continued monetary domination of all indigenous peoples. 

It only takes one visit to this museum to feel the spirit of deceit that lingers thoughout corridors which mainly lead toward gift shops with over priced, sterotypical merchandise and vast restrooms, which were, even opening night, in need of repair. 

This endeavor is nothing but another slap in the face from a thinly veiled hollywood hype promotion of... what, our three or four indigenous government representatives? 

Well, bless their little hearts I say. 

I attended the dinner @ 250.00 per person and listened to the presentations of Colin Powell and Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell. I was not impressed. It is hard for me to believe this museum was not established as a collection plate for casino money and a shopping outlet for Ben Campbell&#039;s jewelry. 

Missing most, from this museum, is the respect for history, for indigenous peoples and the beautiful and renowned work of some of the First Nation&#039;s finest designers, writers, film producers, potters, weavers, jewelers, architects, painters and photographers. 

If they wish to sell true, fine art of the
indigenous people then these museum &quot;curators, buyers and gift shop directors&quot; should first, go to the people. 

There is one good thing, about the Native American Museum,  the restaurant&#039;s coffee is very good. I had several cups.  Deborah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I agree, somewhat, with this perspective. I saw the building as having a vast amount of wasted space. I tried to believe that there is a futuristic element to the design, perhaps bigger and better things are in store&#8230; </p>
<p>I soon realized the archtecture is outlandish and rambles without purpose. (which is typical of and well suited to our government and its representatives) </p>
<p>The exhibits are dark, small, cave-like displays which emphasize most, the miserly greed and the continued monetary domination of all indigenous peoples. </p>
<p>It only takes one visit to this museum to feel the spirit of deceit that lingers thoughout corridors which mainly lead toward gift shops with over priced, sterotypical merchandise and vast restrooms, which were, even opening night, in need of repair. </p>
<p>This endeavor is nothing but another slap in the face from a thinly veiled hollywood hype promotion of&#8230; what, our three or four indigenous government representatives? </p>
<p>Well, bless their little hearts I say. </p>
<p>I attended the dinner @ 250.00 per person and listened to the presentations of Colin Powell and Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell. I was not impressed. It is hard for me to believe this museum was not established as a collection plate for casino money and a shopping outlet for Ben Campbell&#8217;s jewelry. </p>
<p>Missing most, from this museum, is the respect for history, for indigenous peoples and the beautiful and renowned work of some of the First Nation&#8217;s finest designers, writers, film producers, potters, weavers, jewelers, architects, painters and photographers. </p>
<p>If they wish to sell true, fine art of the<br />
indigenous people then these museum &#8220;curators, buyers and gift shop directors&#8221; should first, go to the people. </p>
<p>There is one good thing, about the Native American Museum,  the restaurant&#8217;s coffee is very good. I had several cups.  Deborah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston L. Bannister</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/comment-page-1/#comment-10388</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston L. Bannister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2004/11/28/dc-museum-report/#comment-10388</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

The Getty Museum in Los Angeles is similar.  Very nice building and grounds.  Very nice collection of art.  Very poorly designed lighting - light comes in at just the right angle to reflect off the *surface* of the painting (not the paint).  Dim bluish lighting on paintings that clearly were intended to show best in a &quot;warm&quot; (i.e. yellow/reddish) light.  Astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>The Getty Museum in Los Angeles is similar.  Very nice building and grounds.  Very nice collection of art.  Very poorly designed lighting &#8211; light comes in at just the right angle to reflect off the *surface* of the painting (not the paint).  Dim bluish lighting on paintings that clearly were intended to show best in a &#8220;warm&#8221; (i.e. yellow/reddish) light.  Astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
