<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good movie for Larry Summers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:28:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Driver Education</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Driver Education</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Driver Education</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supply Tool</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Supply Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Rigid Tool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Rigid Tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: National Finance Center</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-2891</link>
		<dc:creator>National Finance Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-2891</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Home Finance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Home Finance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ojsbuddy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>ojsbuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

test post:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02152005.html&quot;&gt;jobs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>test post:<br />
<a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02152005.html">jobs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Greenspun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Greenspun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

K: My $35,000 comment was related to the fact that when a field is all-female the wages tend to be lower.  Wages for scientists are quite low right now (and falling, in real dollars).  The movie implies that nearly all scientists are women.  If true, that could explain why the salaries are so small...  (mostly joking, of course)



Dan:  I like any IMAX movie, including this one.  My companions, most of whom were 25-year-old non-technical women, were disappointed, they said, because they wanted to hear more about the animals and the science and less &quot;gee, this is cool&quot; and nothing at all that was fantasy about intelligent aliens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>K: My $35,000 comment was related to the fact that when a field is all-female the wages tend to be lower.  Wages for scientists are quite low right now (and falling, in real dollars).  The movie implies that nearly all scientists are women.  If true, that could explain why the salaries are so small&#8230;  (mostly joking, of course)</p>
<p>Dan:  I like any IMAX movie, including this one.  My companions, most of whom were 25-year-old non-technical women, were disappointed, they said, because they wanted to hear more about the animals and the science and less &#8220;gee, this is cool&#8221; and nothing at all that was fantasy about intelligent aliens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan W</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 05:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Geez phil, guess you didn&#039;t like the movie.  Can you guess at the target market?  Well, yes, people of color, low income groups, essentially those currently at the socio economic fringe...  folks that hopefully, if they get a chance to see something cool... something that they can see perhaps a potential role model for themselves in, then they might actually get excited about.

(I saw it and spoke w/ James Cameron at the premiere of this film at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Fran last December.)

It&#039;s odd that on the whole we chastise the rappers and other folks for creative violent images with no positive nature, but that when someone tries to show the opposite role model images that we criticize because we&#039;re &#039;cheapening the market&#039; for scientists... or that maybe that women can only do geoscience and not &#039;really hard science&#039; like math/physics or whatever...
what a load of crap.

Why can&#039;t you just say... &#039;thank you&#039;... at least it wasn&#039;t another movie about guns and bombs and REAL gender/cultural stereotypes, like we get from hollywood.  you know, JC pretty much paid for that movie out of his pocket... and hasn&#039;t even come close to recouping any of the costs for it.  So, go drop him an email and share the love.

Personally, I thought it was awesome... one of my favorite movies this year.  Jaw-dropping HiDef 3D ... better than i&#039;ve ever seen 3D (make sure you get a seat in the center of the theatre).

xxooo

dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Geez phil, guess you didn&#8217;t like the movie.  Can you guess at the target market?  Well, yes, people of color, low income groups, essentially those currently at the socio economic fringe&#8230;  folks that hopefully, if they get a chance to see something cool&#8230; something that they can see perhaps a potential role model for themselves in, then they might actually get excited about.</p>
<p>(I saw it and spoke w/ James Cameron at the premiere of this film at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Fran last December.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s odd that on the whole we chastise the rappers and other folks for creative violent images with no positive nature, but that when someone tries to show the opposite role model images that we criticize because we&#8217;re &#8216;cheapening the market&#8217; for scientists&#8230; or that maybe that women can only do geoscience and not &#8216;really hard science&#8217; like math/physics or whatever&#8230;<br />
what a load of crap.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t you just say&#8230; &#8216;thank you&#8217;&#8230; at least it wasn&#8217;t another movie about guns and bombs and REAL gender/cultural stereotypes, like we get from hollywood.  you know, JC pretty much paid for that movie out of his pocket&#8230; and hasn&#8217;t even come close to recouping any of the costs for it.  So, go drop him an email and share the love.</p>
<p>Personally, I thought it was awesome&#8230; one of my favorite movies this year.  Jaw-dropping HiDef 3D &#8230; better than i&#8217;ve ever seen 3D (make sure you get a seat in the center of the theatre).</p>
<p>xxooo</p>
<p>dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>mjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Young women of color in the buff? Whoa, pretty risque for a family venue like an aquarium isn&#039;t it? Still, like K said it might be effective into getting more young men into science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Young women of color in the buff? Whoa, pretty risque for a family venue like an aquarium isn&#8217;t it? Still, like K said it might be effective into getting more young men into science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Unfortunately they don&#039;t make IMAX films about the young women sitting in their offices solving equations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Unfortunately they don&#8217;t make IMAX films about the young women sitting in their offices solving equations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/02/18/good-movie-for-larry-summers/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;Maybe this is why we are able to hire scientists for $35,000/year.&quot; 
Please clarify: are you saying movies like this lure men into science, or that the women shown in the film are not highly qualified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe this is why we are able to hire scientists for $35,000/year.&#8221;<br />
Please clarify: are you saying movies like this lure men into science, or that the women shown in the film are not highly qualified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
