<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying over Scott Peterson&#8217;s House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:26:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Humphrey Bogus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>Humphrey Bogus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Yes, our &quot;irritation&quot; was the state sponsorship of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed hundrends over Lockerbie, Scotland.  Ideologically blinded folks: this was notable because Qaddafi subsequently abandoned sponsorship of terrorist activities directed at the US, as we nearly killed him.  I don&#039;t care whether Reagan slept, ate, danced or made paper mache hats while the F111s were in flight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Yes, our &#8220;irritation&#8221; was the state sponsorship of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed hundrends over Lockerbie, Scotland.  Ideologically blinded folks: this was notable because Qaddafi subsequently abandoned sponsorship of terrorist activities directed at the US, as we nearly killed him.  I don&#8217;t care whether Reagan slept, ate, danced or made paper mache hats while the F111s were in flight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Howard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 03:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Nitpick:  George W Bush flew the F-102, not the F-104.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Nitpick:  George W Bush flew the F-102, not the F-104.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Provost</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Provost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 21:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;...he terrified Qaddafi by not caring enough about the operation to let it disturb his sleep.&quot;
He also terrified him by killing his 2-year old daughter in the bombing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;he terrified Qaddafi by not caring enough about the operation to let it disturb his sleep.&#8221;<br />
He also terrified him by killing his 2-year old daughter in the bombing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gottlieb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gottlieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

It starts in high school.  The bullies who are known to beat their girlfriends (to the point of black eyes and the occassional broken bone) have a continual stream of girlfriends-in-waiting yet the nice guys are usually alone.  It seems like there is some sort of attractiveness that the macho guys have that women can&#039;t seem to resist.

I have little sympathy for women who lament that they can&#039;t find a nice guy, for these are usually the women who wouldn&#039;t give a nice guy the time of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>It starts in high school.  The bullies who are known to beat their girlfriends (to the point of black eyes and the occassional broken bone) have a continual stream of girlfriends-in-waiting yet the nice guys are usually alone.  It seems like there is some sort of attractiveness that the macho guys have that women can&#8217;t seem to resist.</p>
<p>I have little sympathy for women who lament that they can&#8217;t find a nice guy, for these are usually the women who wouldn&#8217;t give a nice guy the time of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lawson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Philip,
We, who sit housebound and deskbound look up to your exploits and insights.  Keep asking those questions, however unusual they may sound, but please never, ever feel it a humbling experience to reflect on Mr. Peterson vis-a-vis relationships.  It is obvious that Scott&#039;s consciousness never permeated beyond his own body.  He was a loner, despite everyone&#039;s attempts.

More to the point of what makes a relationship work, I want to thank you for Chap. 17 in &lt;i&gt;Travels with Samantha.&lt;/i&gt;.  Your insight about Lily was incredibly admirable--thank you for sharing your vulnerability.  And I&#039;ll venture that this is what makes you attractive, far more than your intellect and wealth . . . that quality you share via your writing.  I know that my wife values my sensitivity above all else--it&#039;s what&#039;s kept us ticking together most of 38 years.

Keep on your journey, Philip and thanks for including us in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Philip,<br />
We, who sit housebound and deskbound look up to your exploits and insights.  Keep asking those questions, however unusual they may sound, but please never, ever feel it a humbling experience to reflect on Mr. Peterson vis-a-vis relationships.  It is obvious that Scott&#8217;s consciousness never permeated beyond his own body.  He was a loner, despite everyone&#8217;s attempts.</p>
<p>More to the point of what makes a relationship work, I want to thank you for Chap. 17 in <i>Travels with Samantha.</i>.  Your insight about Lily was incredibly admirable&#8211;thank you for sharing your vulnerability.  And I&#8217;ll venture that this is what makes you attractive, far more than your intellect and wealth . . . that quality you share via your writing.  I know that my wife values my sensitivity above all else&#8211;it&#8217;s what&#8217;s kept us ticking together most of 38 years.</p>
<p>Keep on your journey, Philip and thanks for including us in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george girton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>george girton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 07:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Philip, I believe this is a fundamental insight. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Philip, I believe this is a fundamental insight. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crimson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Crimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 06:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philgtest/2005/05/11/flying-over-scott-petersons-house/#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;This despite the fact that Scott was an adulterer and murderer, both black marks against a person&#039;s character.  So the only reasonable conclusion that a rejected man can draw is that he is less attractive, as a package, than Scott Peterson.&quot;
Very reasonable indeed. :) The cliche about nice guys finishing last seems to be apropos.  No doubt Amber Frye is crying in the arms of some poor fellow about how her boyfriend is a cheating, pregnant-wife murdering bastard and why  oh why can&#039;t she find some nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>&#8220;This despite the fact that Scott was an adulterer and murderer, both black marks against a person&#8217;s character.  So the only reasonable conclusion that a rejected man can draw is that he is less attractive, as a package, than Scott Peterson.&#8221;<br />
Very reasonable indeed. <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The cliche about nice guys finishing last seems to be apropos.  No doubt Amber Frye is crying in the arms of some poor fellow about how her boyfriend is a cheating, pregnant-wife murdering bastard and why  oh why can&#8217;t she find some nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
