<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Aid is Africa&#8217;s biggest problem, not AIDS&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:14:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-31237</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids#comment-31237</guid>
		<description>Phil,
Do we perhaps have to admit that there are certain segments of our human population that simply aren&#039;t able to function as &quot;the rest of us do&quot; due to the fact that these segements have for generation upon generation been afforded a sort of &quot;laziness-tolerance&quot; factor from their aid-providers?
And if not, then how do we possibly go about changing these people&#039;s feelings and beliefs? 
End the aid? In all seriousness, you know that&#039;ll happen when pigs fly.
Regards,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
Do we perhaps have to admit that there are certain segments of our human population that simply aren&#8217;t able to function as &#8220;the rest of us do&#8221; due to the fact that these segements have for generation upon generation been afforded a sort of &#8220;laziness-tolerance&#8221; factor from their aid-providers?<br />
And if not, then how do we possibly go about changing these people&#8217;s feelings and beliefs?<br />
End the aid? In all seriousness, you know that&#8217;ll happen when pigs fly.<br />
Regards,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-31066</link>
		<dc:creator>philg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids#comment-31066</guid>
		<description>Actually Sachs does advocate guaranteeing food, housing, health care, and education to everyone in a society, even if they use those guarantees to have 10 children per family.  He dismisses, in a paragraph or two, the idea that such guarantees will lead to higher birth rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Sachs does advocate guaranteeing food, housing, health care, and education to everyone in a society, even if they use those guarantees to have 10 children per family.  He dismisses, in a paragraph or two, the idea that such guarantees will lead to higher birth rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjstevens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids/comment-page-1/#comment-31041</link>
		<dc:creator>cjstevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/22/aid-is-africas-biggest-problem-not-aids#comment-31041</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while since I read &quot;The End of Poverty,&quot; but unless I misread the book, Sachs was not advocating unlimited free anything.  He was advocating what is necessary to get countries onto the first rung of development, that is to say, &quot;startup capital.&quot;  Indeed, the startup capital perspective makes sense, as what we really want to do is help others to help themselves.  I entirely agree that we don&#039;t want to shovel free stuff to people ad infinitum, but aid itself is not the problem; stupid aid is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I read &#8220;The End of Poverty,&#8221; but unless I misread the book, Sachs was not advocating unlimited free anything.  He was advocating what is necessary to get countries onto the first rung of development, that is to say, &#8220;startup capital.&#8221;  Indeed, the startup capital perspective makes sense, as what we really want to do is help others to help themselves.  I entirely agree that we don&#8217;t want to shovel free stuff to people ad infinitum, but aid itself is not the problem; stupid aid is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
