<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Gulfstream G650</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:24:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Percy C. Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-78650</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy C. Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-78650</guid>
		<description>The Webpage loaded for me via Verizon FiOS in just under 7 secs.  Comcast cable is much slower.  Lots of good stuff there, ( it&#039;s an Advertisement - not a manual ). The brochure was very nice, ( please make it easier to download to Adobe ).

&quot;Man, that water is cold..&quot;

&quot;Sure is...deep, too..&quot;

I love the location of the nav/landing lights in the wing/cargo blister.  Perfect for a pair of &#039;security&#039; swap out 20 mm &#039;personal space&#039; defense appliances.  The opportunity for mods on this swanky mode is astounding.  BR725&#039;s?!  

The G650 is the snot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Webpage loaded for me via Verizon FiOS in just under 7 secs.  Comcast cable is much slower.  Lots of good stuff there, ( it&#8217;s an Advertisement &#8211; not a manual ). The brochure was very nice, ( please make it easier to download to Adobe ).</p>
<p>&#8220;Man, that water is cold..&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Sure is&#8230;deep, too..&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the location of the nav/landing lights in the wing/cargo blister.  Perfect for a pair of &#8217;security&#8217; swap out 20 mm &#8216;personal space&#8217; defense appliances.  The opportunity for mods on this swanky mode is astounding.  BR725&#8217;s?!  </p>
<p>The G650 is the snot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Colohan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77387</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Colohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77387</guid>
		<description>Okay, timed it at work:  54 seconds to load the opening page, 20 seconds to load the first link.  I should complain that my connection here is just as slow as my home DSL service.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, timed it at work:  54 seconds to load the opening page, 20 seconds to load the first link.  I should complain that my connection here is just as slow as my home DSL service.  <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Colohan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77337</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Colohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77337</guid>
		<description>I thought you might be exaggerating on the speed of that web site.  So I just timed it.  Wow!

55 seconds to load the opening page.  20 seconds to load the first link that I clicked on.  On my sonic.net &quot;high speed&quot; DSL.  This has to be the slowest web site I have ever visited.  As one would expect for the world&#039;s fastest business jet.

But, perhaps you are right.  Perhaps my connection to the internet is not fast enough.  I&#039;ll give it a go again tomorrow at work (I work at Google).  Perhaps, just possibly, their network connection is fast enough to do this site justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might be exaggerating on the speed of that web site.  So I just timed it.  Wow!</p>
<p>55 seconds to load the opening page.  20 seconds to load the first link that I clicked on.  On my&nbsp;<a href="http://sonic.net" title="http://sonic. " target="_blank">sonic.net</a> &#8220;high speed&#8221; DSL.  This has to be the slowest web site I have ever visited.  As one would expect for the world&#8217;s fastest business jet.</p>
<p>But, perhaps you are right.  Perhaps my connection to the internet is not fast enough.  I&#8217;ll give it a go again tomorrow at work (I work at Google).  Perhaps, just possibly, their network connection is fast enough to do this site justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperCorgi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77282</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperCorgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77282</guid>
		<description>VNE is what Mach .925?   but those RR BR725 fans are incredible! 16,000lbs T/O thrust?   That&#039;s just shy of an F-4 Phantom&#039;s  J-79s in reheat.     With available thrust, the thing could theoretically be supersonic, although obviously the airframe is not built for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VNE is what Mach .925?   but those RR BR725 fans are incredible! 16,000lbs T/O thrust?   That&#8217;s just shy of an F-4 Phantom&#8217;s  J-79s in reheat.     With available thrust, the thing could theoretically be supersonic, although obviously the airframe is not built for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77222</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77222</guid>
		<description>Try this link:

www.clients.star-digital.co.uk/gulfstream/g650/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clients.star-digital.co.uk/gulfstream/g650/" rel="nofollow">http://www.clients.star-digital.co.uk/gulfstream/g650/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77140</link>
		<dc:creator>philg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77140</guid>
		<description>Jonathan:  I viewed the G650 page on a quad-core Pentium with 3 GB of RAM, connected via the &quot;$10/month extra for higher speed&quot; Comcast cable modem, which Comcast says will do &quot;up to 16 Mbps&quot;, but I personally haven&#039;t seen more than about 10 Mbps sustained from any one server.  Perhaps the page will load subjectively fast when the average household has multiple Verizon FiOS 30 Mbps connections?

&quot;Rich media&quot;? Mostly what I noticed was the poverty of information on the site.  There is more information on just the top page of http://news.google.com/, which loads instantly, than in the entire G650 &quot;microsite&quot;.  As for the music, I am often using my desktop computer to listen to Rhapsody or a radio station, so I find it annoying when a Web page has a soundtrack.

My philosophy of Web design may admittedly be atavistic.  When students ask how to design a page or interface, I say &quot;Compare what you&#039;ve built to Google, Yahoo, and Amazon.  Any differences are mistakes.&quot;

[I might add that our helicopters share a hangar with a Gulfstream G-IV, for which there is an adjacent management office.  The Gulfstream team, which includes pilots, a mechanic, and a flight attendant, shares a 384 Kbps Covad DSL line.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan:  I viewed the G650 page on a quad-core Pentium with 3 GB of RAM, connected via the &#8220;$10/month extra for higher speed&#8221; Comcast cable modem, which Comcast says will do &#8220;up to 16 Mbps&#8221;, but I personally haven&#8217;t seen more than about 10 Mbps sustained from any one server.  Perhaps the page will load subjectively fast when the average household has multiple Verizon FiOS 30 Mbps connections?</p>
<p>&#8220;Rich media&#8221;? Mostly what I noticed was the poverty of information on the site.  There is more information on just the top page of <a href="http://news.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://news.google.com/</a>, which loads instantly, than in the entire G650 &#8220;microsite&#8221;.  As for the music, I am often using my desktop computer to listen to Rhapsody or a radio station, so I find it annoying when a Web page has a soundtrack.</p>
<p>My philosophy of Web design may admittedly be atavistic.  When students ask how to design a page or interface, I say &#8220;Compare what you&#8217;ve built to Google, Yahoo, and Amazon.  Any differences are mistakes.&#8221;</p>
<p>[I might add that our helicopters share a hangar with a Gulfstream G-IV, for which there is an adjacent management office.  The Gulfstream team, which includes pilots, a mechanic, and a flight attendant, shares a 384 Kbps Covad DSL line.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan King</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77093</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77093</guid>
		<description>Phil:

Thanks for your comments.  My team and I created the G650 microsite, and had a lot of fun doing it.

Sorry it took so long for you to load the website - it does contain a lot of rich media, better suited for high-bandwidth web connections.
Jonathan King</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil:</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  My team and I created the G650 microsite, and had a lot of fun doing it.</p>
<p>Sorry it took so long for you to load the website &#8211; it does contain a lot of rich media, better suited for high-bandwidth web connections.<br />
Jonathan King</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wihl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77080</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wihl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77080</guid>
		<description>The new 650 is very impressive, but it better be at that price. It&#039;s only 3.4 kts faster than the Citation X. As you may recall, we saw a X with new blended winglets being tested on s/n 0 when we were in ICT in December. I bet that the sole purpose of the new winglets is to retain bragging rights as the fastest non-military plane, even for a design 12 years older than the 650.

And bragging rights are important when both companies spend thousands of dollars of jet A just to turn their planes into big Etch-a-sketches.

GulfStream: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW

Cessna response in a X:  http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new 650 is very impressive, but it better be at that price. It&#8217;s only 3.4 kts faster than the Citation X. As you may recall, we saw a X with new blended winglets being tested on s/n 0 when we were in ICT in December. I bet that the sole purpose of the new winglets is to retain bragging rights as the fastest non-military plane, even for a design 12 years older than the 650.</p>
<p>And bragging rights are important when both companies spend thousands of dollars of jet A just to turn their planes into big Etch-a-sketches.</p>
<p>GulfStream: <a href="http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW" rel="nofollow">http://flightaware.com/live/flight/GLF17/history/20070206/1538Z/KATW/KATW</a></p>
<p>Cessna response in a X:  <a href="http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT" rel="nofollow">http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N750CX/history/20080307/1757Z/KICT/KICT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/comment-page-1/#comment-77077</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2008/03/13/the-new-gulfstream-g650/#comment-77077</guid>
		<description>&quot;The world’s fastest flying airplane comes with the world’s slowest loading Web site&quot;

Sweet. That&#039;s a haiku of truth.

You were too gracious to mention the super cheesy music, I hear a Casio keyboard playing a vibe with hints of Miami Vice, or is it Axel F?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The world’s fastest flying airplane comes with the world’s slowest loading Web site&#8221;</p>
<p>Sweet. That&#8217;s a haiku of truth.</p>
<p>You were too gracious to mention the super cheesy music, I hear a Casio keyboard playing a vibe with hints of Miami Vice, or is it Axel F?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
