<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only polite to insinuate a man could be gay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/</link>
	<description>A posting every day; an interesting idea every three months...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:08:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian McManus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-131532</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian McManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/?p=1390#comment-131532</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gay and still don&#039;t own an iPhone... Sounds like he was avoiding the question. ;)

It&#039;s pretty cool that this neutral politeness is beginning to occur.  I can easily see how someone may be offended.  But many are pretty relaxed and don&#039;t mind the neutrality...

In conversations like this the boss usually pauses and I will state what sounds PC &quot;Spouse,&quot; &quot;Partner,&quot; or &quot;Other Half&quot; is what I will usually interject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gay and still don&#8217;t own an iPhone&#8230; Sounds like he was avoiding the question. <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty cool that this neutral politeness is beginning to occur.  I can easily see how someone may be offended.  But many are pretty relaxed and don&#8217;t mind the neutrality&#8230;</p>
<p>In conversations like this the boss usually pauses and I will state what sounds PC &#8220;Spouse,&#8221; &#8220;Partner,&#8221; or &#8220;Other Half&#8221; is what I will usually interject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Drescher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-128882</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Drescher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/?p=1390#comment-128882</guid>
		<description>Suppose the 21-year-old was white and the boss had spoken of &quot;meeting the Caucasian you&#039;ll want to marry&quot;. It&#039;d be unwarrantedly and unnecessarily presumptuous of him to be that specific (even if the specificity is statistically likely); and the same principle applies to the boss&#039;s initial presumption about gender. So I think it&#039;s to his credit that he amended his remark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose the 21-year-old was white and the boss had spoken of &#8220;meeting the Caucasian you&#8217;ll want to marry&#8221;. It&#8217;d be unwarrantedly and unnecessarily presumptuous of him to be that specific (even if the specificity is statistically likely); and the same principle applies to the boss&#8217;s initial presumption about gender. So I think it&#8217;s to his credit that he amended his remark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-128020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/?p=1390#comment-128020</guid>
		<description>So in the USA, the iPhone is famous for being preferred by gays ??  Here in Brazil, you could be suspected of being gay if you use a Macbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in the USA, the iPhone is famous for being preferred by gays ??  Here in Brazil, you could be suspected of being gay if you use a Macbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-127942</link>
		<dc:creator>David H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/?p=1390#comment-127942</guid>
		<description>Even if not an attempt to be politically correct, personally I really see no need to be offended by someone suggesting I would be straight or gay or whatever, if no harm was meant.. Unless of course it was used as an insult, but then it wouldn&#039;t be about the content anyway..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if not an attempt to be politically correct, personally I really see no need to be offended by someone suggesting I would be straight or gay or whatever, if no harm was meant.. Unless of course it was used as an insult, but then it wouldn&#8217;t be about the content anyway..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/06/18/only-polite-to-insinuate-a-man-could-be-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-127897</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/?p=1390#comment-127897</guid>
		<description>I chuckled when I read your story.  But the boss wasn&#039;t being polite, just clumsy.  He could have easily kept it gender neutral by stating that it would be easier to find the right spouse in college -- there was no need to be gender specific especially nowadays where more and more states are allowing gays to get married.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chuckled when I read your story.  But the boss wasn&#8217;t being polite, just clumsy.  He could have easily kept it gender neutral by stating that it would be easier to find the right spouse in college &#8212; there was no need to be gender specific especially nowadays where more and more states are allowing gays to get married.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
