<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why has the Bush Administration mobilized on HIV/AIDS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2005/12/02/why-has-the-bush-administration-mobilized-on-hivaids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2005/12/02/why-has-the-bush-administration-mobilized-on-hivaids/</link>
	<description>Just what it says</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:28:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Politics and Policy of HIV/AIDS &#187; Bush triples aid to Africa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2005/12/02/why-has-the-bush-administration-mobilized-on-hivaids/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics and Policy of HIV/AIDS &#187; Bush triples aid to Africa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2005/12/02/why-has-the-bush-administration-m#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] So what explains the Bush Administration&#8217;s interest in Africa? I&#8217;ve written extensively on this before, but Michael Gerson, Bush&#8217;s former speechwriter, makes the point again here: I think there are two reinforcing trends here. One of them is the upside of foreign policy moralism. Another one is the growing strategic significance of Africa: the conflict with radical Islam; the problem of failed states and terrorism; and the growing importance of Africa on the resource side: oil. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what explains the Bush Administration&#8217;s interest in Africa? I&#8217;ve written extensively on this before, but Michael Gerson, Bush&#8217;s former speechwriter, makes the point again here: I think there are two reinforcing trends here. One of them is the upside of foreign policy moralism. Another one is the growing strategic significance of Africa: the conflict with radical Islam; the problem of failed states and terrorism; and the growing importance of Africa on the resource side: oil. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
