<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RED campaign earns just $18mn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2007/03/05/red-campaign-earns-just-18mn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2007/03/05/red-campaign-earns-just-18mn/</link>
	<description>Just what it says</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:28:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shrinkingisaac.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All Falls Down (Kanye West)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2007/03/05/red-campaign-earns-just-18mn/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>shrinkingisaac.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All Falls Down (Kanye West)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/politicshiv/2007/03/05/red-campaign-earns-just-18mn/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] A few weeks ago, jt asked &#8220;and you want me to wear a bracelet?&#8220;, which i couldn&#8217;t help but think was the propoer response to the Red campaign. Now, if there is something you are going to purchase anyway, i guess throwing your money in the direction of soemthing like one of these products isn&#8217;t a bad choice, but if you are really interested in making a contribution to combatting HIV (or whatever other cause is currently linked to your consumption), then why not, as asked in this post about the questionable (at best) success of the Red campaigin, &#8220;Why not just cut out all the shirts and sunglasses that you might not need and donate directly to the Global Fund?&#8221; $18m? That&#8217;s it? (Especially problematic when &gt;$100m was spent advertising the campaign.) What were the receipt totals that those donations were attached to? More than $1b? That&#8217;s my guess. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks ago, jt asked &#8220;and you want me to wear a bracelet?&#8220;, which i couldn&#8217;t help but think was the propoer response to the Red campaign. Now, if there is something you are going to purchase anyway, i guess throwing your money in the direction of soemthing like one of these products isn&#8217;t a bad choice, but if you are really interested in making a contribution to combatting HIV (or whatever other cause is currently linked to your consumption), then why not, as asked in this post about the questionable (at best) success of the Red campaigin, &#8220;Why not just cut out all the shirts and sunglasses that you might not need and donate directly to the Global Fund?&#8221; $18m? That&#8217;s it? (Especially problematic when &gt;$100m was spent advertising the campaign.) What were the receipt totals that those donations were attached to? More than $1b? That&#8217;s my guess. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
